The apologist’s evening prayer

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5889
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: The apologist’s evening prayer

Post by MG 2.0 »

Chap wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:34 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:18 pm
I'm always a bit flummoxed as to why the critics seem to be so concerned about God stepping in and micromanaging on every little decision/policy/pronouncement.
Have you read Doctrines and Covenantts recently?

The Mormon deity seems quite happy to micromanage in the revelations recorded by Joseph Smith. See below.

Wash in whisky, saith the Lord ... (verse 7). And hold off hot drinks ... (verse 9). Had he nothing more important to attend to?

Here is section 89:
1 A Word of Wisdom, for the benefit of the council of high priests, assembled in Kirtland, and the church, and also the saints in Zion—

2 To be sent greeting; not by commandment or constraint, but by revelation and the word of wisdom, showing forth the order and will of God in the temporal salvation of all saints in the last days—

3 Given for a principle with promise, adapted to the capacity of the weak and the weakest of all saints, who are or can be called saints.

4 Behold, verily, thus saith the Lord unto you: In consequence of evils and designs which do and will exist in the hearts of conspiring men in the last days, I have warned you, and forewarn you, by giving unto you this word of wisdom by revelation—

5 That inasmuch as any man drinketh wine or strong drink among you, behold it is not good, neither meet in the sight of your Father, only in assembling yourselves together to offer up your sacraments before him.

6 And, behold, this should be wine, yea, pure wine of the grape of the vine, of your own make.

7 And, again, strong drinks are not for the belly, but for the washing of your bodies.

8 And again, tobacco is not for the body, neither for the belly, and is not good for man, but is an herb for bruises and all sick cattle, to be used with judgment and skill.

9 And again, hot drinks are not for the body or belly.

10 And again, verily I say unto you, all wholesome herbs God hath ordained for the constitution, nature, and use of man—

11 Every herb in the season thereof, and every fruit in the season thereof; all these to be used with prudence and thanksgiving.

12 Yea, flesh also of beasts and of the fowls of the air, I, the Lord, have ordained for the use of man with thanksgiving; nevertheless they are to be used sparingly;

13 And it is pleasing unto me that they should not be used, only in times of winter, or of cold, or famine.

14 All grain is ordained for the use of man and of beasts, to be the staff of life, not only for man but for the beasts of the field, and the fowls of heaven, and all wild animals that run or creep on the earth;

15 And these hath God made for the use of man only in times of famine and excess of hunger.

16 All grain is good for the food of man; as also the fruit of the vine; that which yieldeth fruit, whether in the ground or above the ground—

17 Nevertheless, wheat for man, and corn for the ox, and oats for the horse, and rye for the fowls and for swine, and for all beasts of the field, and barley for all useful animals, and for mild drinks, as also other grain.

18 And all saints who remember to keep and do these sayings, walking in obedience to the commandments, shall receive health in their navel and marrow to their bones;

19 And shall find wisdom and great treasures of knowledge, even hidden treasures;

20 And shall run and not be weary, and shall walk and not faint.

21 And I, the Lord, give unto them a promise, that the destroying angel shall pass by them, as the children of Israel, and not slay them. Amen.
Early restoration period. Not so much now. Things are set up and the doctrine of agency and 'act and acted upon' (Book of Mormon) are in play now more than then. The D&C also makes it clear that we do not need to be commanded in all things. The Saints at that time may have needed some 'push' away from that worldview in regards to God and His intervention in the world.

The world today is a different world than the one in which some sections in the D&C were given. The church and its members were "fundamentalists" in a sense, simply because of the world they lived in. There are still fundamentalists today, many of them critics of the church.

Regards,
MG
drumdude
God
Posts: 7281
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: The apologist’s evening prayer

Post by drumdude »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:43 pm
There are still fundamentalists today, many of them critics of the church.
:lol:
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5889
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: The apologist’s evening prayer

Post by MG 2.0 »

drumdude wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:49 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:43 pm
There are still fundamentalists today, many of them critics of the church.
:lol:
It's true!!

Regards,
MG
User avatar
Everybody Wang Chung
God
Posts: 2776
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am

Re: The apologist’s evening prayer

Post by Everybody Wang Chung »

drumdude wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:49 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:43 pm
There are still fundamentalists today, many of them critics of the church.
:lol:
Drumdude,

You are a better man than I am. I put MG on block yesterday. I can't see anything MG posts anymore, only if someone quotes him.

The board is so much better without reading MG's troll posts. You should give it a try..
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 5485
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am

Re: The apologist’s evening prayer

Post by Philo Sofee »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:47 am
Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 3:41 am
If the church is truly led by God’s prophet, seer and revelator, the Apostles and General Authorities, then why are there self-appointed mopologists?
In my mind, the fact that the Salt Lake City-based church has a public relations spokesman is a huge red flag. If it was really being led by Jesus Christ, shouldn't THE PROPHET be the public relations spokesman?
+100
drumdude
God
Posts: 7281
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: The apologist’s evening prayer

Post by drumdude »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:01 pm
drumdude wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:49 pm


:lol:
Drumdude,

You are a better man than I am. I put MG on block yesterday. I can't see anything MG posts anymore, only if someone quotes him.

The board is so much better without reading MG's troll posts. You should give it a try..
I still enjoy his perspective. Even if we disagree. I get the impression the MG I know is a bit more mellow than the MG 1.0 that I didn’t know.
Marcus
God
Posts: 6836
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: The apologist’s evening prayer

Post by Marcus »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:01 pm
drumdude wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:49 pm


:lol:
Drumdude,

You are a better man than I am. I put MG on block yesterday. I can't see anything MG posts anymore, only if someone quotes him.

The board is so much better without reading MG's troll posts. You should give it a try..
Amen to that!!!!!!!!!!
Marcus
God
Posts: 6836
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: The apologist’s evening prayer

Post by Marcus »

drumdude wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:10 pm
Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:01 pm


Drumdude,

You are a better man than I am. I put MG on block yesterday. I can't see anything MG posts anymore, only if someone quotes him.

The board is so much better without reading MG's troll posts. You should give it a try..
I still enjoy his perspective. Even if we disagree. I get the impression the MG I know is a bit more mellow than the MG 1.0 that I didn’t know.
Lucky for you he thinks you're a guy and doesn't make sexist remarks online, such as asking if your spouse approves of what you post, or saying he envisions you with a 'high, squeaky voice', (because you're female of course), or saying he needs to know if you are female, because 'it matters' to him which sex you are when he responds.

If you can look past that, well, maybe you shouldn't. And if your response is 'he hasn't said anything like that to me,' maybe you should consider why.
drumdude
God
Posts: 7281
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: The apologist’s evening prayer

Post by drumdude »

Marcus wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:37 pm
drumdude wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:10 pm


I still enjoy his perspective. Even if we disagree. I get the impression the MG I know is a bit more mellow than the MG 1.0 that I didn’t know.
Lucky for you he thinks you're a guy and doesn't make sexist remarks online, such as asking if your spouse approves of what you post, or saying he envisions you with a 'high, squeaky voice', (because you're female of course), or saying he needs to know if you are female, because 'it matters' to him which sex you are when he responds.

If you can look past that, well, maybe you shouldn't. And if your response is 'he hasn't said anything like that to me,' maybe you should consider why.
Is this still accessible in the forum history?

I think I’ve seen him apologize for how he acted in the past. Which doesn’t excuse that behavior, but people should also have room to grow and make amends.
Marcus
God
Posts: 6836
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: The apologist’s evening prayer

Post by Marcus »

drumdude wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:55 pm
Marcus wrote:
Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:37 pm

Lucky for you he thinks you're a guy and doesn't make sexist remarks online, such as asking if your spouse approves of what you post, or saying he envisions you with a 'high, squeaky voice', (because you're female of course), or saying he needs to know if you are female, because 'it matters' to him which sex you are when he responds.

If you can look past that, well, maybe you shouldn't. And if your response is 'he hasn't said anything like that to me,' maybe you should consider why.
Is this still accessible in the forum history?

I think I’ve seen him apologize for how he acted in the past. Which doesn’t excuse that behavior, but people should also have room to grow and make amends.
I agree "people should also have room to grow and make amends", but that assumes they make amends and then grow, right? If you've seen apologies, I would be interested in reading them. I think I've seen a very few, very generalized "I should behave better" type remarks, but given that the behavior doesn't change, I don't count those as actual apologies.

As for the sexism, his last sexist remark was about 1-2 weeks ago, and no, there was no apology, even though multiple people asked him about it. I have never seen an apology for his sexist remarks over the years, but I've seen several justifications for why his god thinks it is okay to make those types of sexist remarks.
Post Reply