Trump's War on the First Amendment

[Whiskey]

You mean, have some Whiskey? Nah, that is like a truth serum.

Interesting admission. Thanks.

Let’s break this down, because it matters.

You’ve taken a witty throwaway and somehow elevated it into an “admission.” On one hand, you’ve decided I’m AI. On the other, you claim you’ve uncovered a confession that simply isn’t there. That’s not logic — it’s circular reasoning. You start with the conclusion you want, interpret neutral words as proof, then point back to your own interpretation as evidence.

And this ties back to the OP. The claim there was that Jimmy Kimmel is a “casualty” of Trump’s supposed assault on the First Amendment. But no rights were violated. ABC had the authority to keep or drop him. The FCC hasn’t pulled a license. Just like with your “admission” that doesn’t exist, you’re building a case out of assumptions stacked on assumptions. What you reveal isn’t proof of censorship or authoritarianism — it’s your own need to see victimhood where none exists.

Now, your next move is to dismiss what has been pointed out, declare yourself a victim, call it AI, LOL and take your kickball off the playground. Will you need your pacifier soaked in a hot toddy?

[Kishkumen]

Let’s break this down, because it matters.

Wow, if you think it "matters," you need to get a life.

[Whiskey]

Fourth, drop the almighty victimization, Kishkumen. Fifth, substantiate this. Sixth, the alleged misdeeds are part of the system and conditions. It is not an excuse if it is the given terms. Seventh, Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Google, Apple and on, and on, and on. AI says, we accept your conditions.

AI thinks it is funny as hell that you consider misdeeds not part of the conditions.

Conditions for what, continuing the usual whataboutism that turns every political discussion into a complete waste of time?

Good Lord, man, your masochism is out of control.

The referenced conditions weren’t just about you, LOL. LMFAO.

The conditions are that censorship and smashing free speech aren’t unique to Kimmel’s employer finally having enough of his BS. The conditions are that past administrations used the same tactics — politically, with force and coercion — and it was applauded. The conditions are bigger than you, though thanks for centering yourself.

The conditions are that you launched personal attacks on Hound for asking pertinent questions, and now you’re pretending to be the victim of your own choices. And the final condition? You’ll keep crying harder. AI says so.

[Whiskey]

Let’s break this down, because it matters.

Wow, if you think it "matters," you need to get a life.

The pattern continues, another conclusion drawn not from facts, but from your assumptions and feelings. At the very least, could you let us know if your pacifier needs to be dipped in a hot toddy with honey?

[Kishkumen]

The referenced conditions weren’t just about you, LOL. LMFAO.

The conditions are that censorship and smashing free speech aren’t unique to Kimmel’s employer finally having enough of his BS. The conditions are that past administrations used the same tactics — politically, with force and coercion — and it was applauded. The conditions are bigger than you, though thanks for centering yourself.

The conditions are that you launched personal attacks on Hound for asking pertinent questions, and now you’re pretending to be the victim of your own choices. And the final condition? You’ll keep crying harder. AI says so.

I was not aware that narcissist like you see narcissism everywhere. "You think it's all about you!" ("It's really about me and how clever I am!")

I am getting an education in narcissism in the Trump years.

Seriously, though, I love how any president in history who does something wrong becomes you guys' apologetic for why Trump can't handle some humor at his expense. I mean, check the guy's "Troth Sential" feed. Pretty damn pathetic. I would say the only thing more pathetic than Trump's whinging is your whinging on his behalf!

Seriously! No self respect. You have zero self respect.

[Kishkumen]

The pattern continues, another conclusion drawn not from facts, but from your assumptions and feelings. At the very least, could you let us know if your pacifier needs to be dipped in a hot toddy with honey?

I hate to break it to you. But I am not in your brain. If you don't want me to respond to your words "Because this matters," do us both a favor and stop typing them. Pick things you actually want to talk about. Don't say something is important if you don't mean it. Obviously we are wasting our time engaging with whatever it is you are or has become of you.

[Whiskey]

The referenced conditions weren’t just about you, LOL. LMFAO.

The conditions are that censorship and smashing free speech aren’t unique to Kimmel’s employer finally having enough of his BS. The conditions are that past administrations used the same tactics — politically, with force and coercion — and it was applauded. The conditions are bigger than you, though thanks for centering yourself.

The conditions are that you launched personal attacks on Hound for asking pertinent questions, and now you’re pretending to be the victim of your own choices. And the final condition? You’ll keep crying harder. AI says so.

I was not aware that narcissist like you see narcissism everywhere. "You think it's all about you!" ("It's really about me and how clever I am!")

I am getting an education in narcissism in the Trump years.

Seriously, though, I love how any president in history who does something wrong becomes you guys' apologetic for why Trump can't handle some humor at his expense. I mean, check the guy's "Troth Sential" feed. Pretty damn pathetic. I would say the only thing more pathetic than Trump's whinging is your whinging on his behalf!

Seriously! No self respect. You have zero self respect.

Uh, ummm… Kishkuman, you’re approaching peak meltdown. You’re about to blow a gasket, and you probably know it. Every accusation and conclusion you’ve thrown out has failed. By “a lot,” I mean all of them: the AI nonsense, the anger nonsense, the danger nonsense, all of it. Now you’re at the ban point - which, fittingly, is something you already proposed. A ban built on assumptions. The next “condition” you’ll secure is exactly what you want: no conversations where you’re challenged with facts or reality. That will be you divorcing yourself from the discussion.

You complained about whataboutism, then turned around and pushed the most outrageous whataboutism possible. You dismiss substance, assign motives you can’t possibly judge, and then pretend you’ve retained credibility. Though no credibility about who is or isn’t a narcissist.

And “getting an education”, real or perceived , is not the same as being educated. Thanks for the evidence.

[Whiskey]

The pattern continues, another conclusion drawn not from facts, but from your assumptions and feelings. At the very least, could you let us know if your pacifier needs to be dipped in a hot toddy with honey?

I hate to break it to you. But I am not in your brain. If you don't want me to respond to your words "Because this matters," do us both a favor and stop typing them. Pick things you actually want to talk about. Don't say something is important if you don't mean it. Obviously we are wasting our time engaging with whatever it is you are or has become of you.

Not a break. I am aware that you are not in my brain. Please, respond to my words. By all means. Do so with more cowbell though, please. More cowbell. I will address things I want to talk about and continue to do so authentically. I will also address the assumptions, conclusions and assertions made within that conversation.

For example - your assumption that I don't want you to respond is absurd. Respond away. What kind of twisted nonsense did it take for you to believe otherwise, certainly not reality and not facts. Right? I will respond to your words, particularly the funny ones. Like, dumb assumptions that I don't want you to respond to mine, I will respond to that. See?

[Kishkumen]

Uh, ummm… Kishkuman, you’re approaching peak meltdown.

Interesting how you can't even spell a name that is throwing you into a blind rage. How your posting style has evolved? One would think someone had gotten your goat or something!

[Kishkumen]

Not a break. I am aware that you are not in my brain. Please, respond to my words. By all means. Do so with more cowbell though, please.

I respond to your words with exactly the quality of response they merit. Nothing more, nothing less.