LOL, I am open for a conversation. Show me were I wrote that in the context you present here. Please back up your assertion with what I actually wrote.
Don't you see, Markk? It was asserted and you can't unassert their assertion. Then, they told you to unprove their assertion, which you have failed to do.
If you can't start with the conclusion and find the assertions to firmly and convincingly assert, you may not be a democrat or a lawyer. Are you one of those?
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
LOL, I am open for a conversation. Show me were I wrote that in the context you present here. Please back up your assertion with what I actually wrote.
Mark, I get that you will really don’t want to discuss my point — that you are so motivated by your prejudices that you actually claimed that the FCC chair’s statements weren’t even evidence when you stridently took the opposite position on the same kind of evidence when subject was Joe Biden. I get that you want to distract from your utter hypocrisy by now nitpicking over the words I chose to describe my recollection of your position are identical to the words you chose. I didn’t purport to quote you, so whether my words match yours exactly is simply a distraction from my point. If you dispute my actual point, your’re free to wrong. But prove my actual point wrong — not some other fight you want to pick.
he/him
“I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time so that my children can live in peace.” — Thomas Paine
LOL, I am open for a conversation. Show me were I wrote that in the context you present here. Please back up your assertion with what I actually wrote.
Mark, I get that you will really don’t want to discuss my point — that you are so motivated by your prejudices that you actually claimed that the FCC chair’s statements weren’t even evidence when you stridently took the opposite position on the same kind of evidence when subject was Joe Biden. I get that you want to distract from your utter hypocrisy by now nitpicking over the words I chose to describe my recollection of your position are identical to the words you chose. I didn’t purport to quote you, so whether my words match yours exactly is simply a distraction from my point. If you dispute my actual point, your’re free to wrong. But prove my actual point wrong — not some other fight you want to pick.
In the meantime, any progress on the evidence that Disney and Sinclair lied? The Devon Archer sideshow is interesting, but do we have evidence that Disney lied or just a conclusion that they lied?
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
LOL, I am open for a conversation. Show me were I wrote that in the context you present here. Please back up your assertion with what I actually wrote.
Mark, I get that you will really don’t want to discuss my point — that you are so motivated by your prejudices that you actually claimed that the FCC chair’s statements weren’t even evidence when you stridently took the opposite position on the same kind of evidence when subject was Joe Biden. I get that you want to distract from your utter hypocrisy by now nitpicking over the words I chose to describe my recollection of your position are identical to the words you chose. I didn’t purport to quote you, so whether my words match yours exactly is simply a distraction from my point. If you dispute my actual point, your’re free to wrong. But prove my actual point wrong — not some other fight you want to pick.
LOL...so whether or not you are just making stuff up, or actually factual it does not matter? Classic. If you proport words I did not say, as if I said them, that is called lying about what I said.
And, Where did I claim the FCC chair's statements were not evidence?
Mark, I get that you will really don’t want to discuss my point — that you are so motivated by your prejudices that you actually claimed that the FCC chair’s statements weren’t even evidence when you stridently took the opposite position on the same kind of evidence when subject was Joe Biden. I get that you want to distract from your utter hypocrisy by now nitpicking over the words I chose to describe my recollection of your position are identical to the words you chose. I didn’t purport to quote you, so whether my words match yours exactly is simply a distraction from my point. If you dispute my actual point, your’re free to wrong. But prove my actual point wrong — not some other fight you want to pick.
LOL...so whether or not you are just making stuff up, or actually factual it does not matter? Classic. If you proport words I did not say, as if I said them, that is called lying about what I said.
And, Where did I claim the FCC chair's statements were not evidence?
So you agree that the FCC chair’s statements were evidence of Kish’s claim that Kimmel was suspended because of government threat?
he/him
“I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time so that my children can live in peace.” — Thomas Paine
LOL...so whether or not you are just making stuff up, or actually factual it does not matter? Classic. If you proport words I did not say, as if I said them, that is called lying about what I said.
And, Where did I claim the FCC chair's statements were not evidence?
So you agree that the FCC chair’s statements were evidence of Kish’s claim that Kimmel was suspended because of government threat?
I said nothing about that.... you just made it up, like you made up a statement about Archer I never said. Why do you do that?
I'll ask again, where did I say the things you claimed I did?
So you agree that the FCC chair’s statements were evidence of Kish’s claim that Kimmel was suspended because of government threat?
I said nothing about that.... you just made it up, like you made up a statement about Archer I never said. Why do you do that?
I'll ask again, where did I say the things you claimed I did?
SMFH. How about Kish says what he says, Res says what he says, and Markk says what he says? I have no idea why people need to be so right about what other people said and think.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
