The artificial intelligence MEGATHREAD

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

^

[Whiskey]

Your posts, along with your cabal's posts, are hopelessly stupid. Nobody gives two damnits what you pretend someone else thinks or hopes. LOL. You may be correct once in a thousand guesses. Nobody cares. It is just a yawn.

This didn’t last long:

Addressing the contemt without making every goddamn post about the poster is also fine.

Here is your response for the day, you stupid dummy.

What was the content of Marcus's post? I will help you.

MG is hoping no one will open it, but only because he uses it to troll and not because he intends it to be actual useful information. He doesn't want credit for a gift, he wants his superiority to reign. The problem (for him) is his use of AI is so blatantly troll-like that no one sees his 'superiority', and no one is fooled.

I addressed the content of her post. Pay attention, dummy.

[Gadianton]

I had to study for a certification exam recently. A five hour exam. One hundred questions. Standard testing center protocols with proctors and all that stuff. I used AI to create a 27,000 line script using every question of every published practice exam,

That's fantastic. If only Hound would do the same for his personal study and learn basic definitions of things, like the definition of "Marxism" or "DEI", or even learn enough about a topic to know when somebody is claiming bare reason is at odds with faith, they aren't saying anything at all about evidence.

[Whiskey]

I had to study for a certification exam recently. A five hour exam. One hundred questions. Standard testing center protocols with proctors and all that stuff. I used AI to create a 27,000 line script using every question of every published practice exam,

That's fantastic. If only Hound would do the same for his personal study and learn basic definitions of things, like the definition of "Marxism" or "DEI", or even learn enough about a topic to know when somebody is claiming bare reason is at odds with faith, they aren't saying anything at all about evidence.

I doubt the subject material would interest you at all, Gad. Though, I think the process of studying using AI would be interesting to you. The writing portion of it was actually very fun and challenging.

I used — Chat, Grok, Gemini, Claude and a few others. They all have massive weaknesses. Only Chat had a core strength in this process : volume. Chat could handle massive data. Grok was much better at formatting than Chat — but it did not retain instructions well at all. Meaning, the formatting after 10 exchanges, may get a hard reset by Grok. No good. Not useful.

Grok wrote better formulas than Chat but could not create scientific proofs that referenced the formula table. No good. In the end.... Grok turned out to be useless for this project.

None of the bots could accurately process more than about three pages of uploaded data at a time. Full chapters could be sent to Chat and Claude. Claude couldn't do anything useful with the uploads and Chat has a massive glitch where they fill in the blanks and start guessing on what could be in the uploaded data.

[canpakes]

This didn’t last long:

Here is your response for the day, you stupid dummy.

What was the content of Marcus's post? I will help you.

MG is hoping no one will open it, but only because he uses it to troll and not because he intends it to be actual useful information. He doesn't want credit for a gift, he wants his superiority to reign. The problem (for him) is his use of AI is so blatantly troll-like that no one sees his 'superiority', and no one is fooled.

I addressed the content of her post. Pay attention, dummy.

That’s a great demonstration of the problem with the complaint. Not even you can follow your advice because of how post content + author are intertwined. I’m glad that you ended up illustrating this.

The same issue even exists with AI-generated posts.

[Whiskey]

Here is your response for the day, you stupid dummy.

What was the content of Marcus's post? I will help you.

…

I addressed the content of her post. Pay attention, dummy.

That’s a great demonstration of the problem with the complaint. Not even you can follow your advice because of how post + author are intertwined. I’m glad that you ended up illustrating this.

The same issue even exists with AI-generated posts.

Bonus Answer.

No. Lem responded to Physics Guy with some imagination priesthood knowing crap about MG. So just shut the “F” up, dummy. You are welcome.

[canpakes]

That’s a great demonstration of the problem with the complaint. Not even you can follow your advice because of how post + author are intertwined. I’m glad that you ended up illustrating this.

The same issue even exists with AI-generated posts.

Bonus Answer.

No. Lem responded to Physics Guy with some imagination priesthood knowing crap about MG. So just shut the “F” up, dummy. You are welcome.

There it is again. : D

[MG 2.0]

I don’t. I approved all A.I responses before posting them and taking responsibility for their content. That should be good enough.

It’s not. And yet loads of other useless shenanigans is permitted and even encouraged.

Regards,
MG

When you have your own eternal domain, you can set the rules such that AI content is acceptable, if the poster "approves" the content.

Will you then permit posters to constantly complain about your rules, and insist that your rules stack the deck against them - a.k.a. acting the martyr?

You may recall that I suggested a compromise solution, but that the owner of this domain was not convinced that it would work. In any case, he articulated quite clearly what is and is not permitted, and why. But do carry on complaining.

Free expression, right?

Regards,
MG

[I Have Questions]

When you have your own eternal domain, you can set the rules such that AI content is acceptable, if the poster "approves" the content.
Will you then permit posters to constantly complain about your rules, and insist that your rules stack the deck against them - a.k.a. acting the martyr?

You may recall that I suggested a compromise solution, but that the owner of this domain was not convinced that it would work. In any case, he articulated quite clearly what is and is not permitted, and why. But do carry on complaining.

Free expression, right?

Regards,
MG

You don’t seem to understand what free expression means. Let me help you…[AI]Free expression is the right to hold opinions and share ideas, information, and views without government interference, encompassing speech, writing, art, protest, and media, but it's not absolute and can be limited to prevent harm, hate speech, or threats, balancing individual rights with public safety and order[/AI]…in the context of this board, you cannot freely express whatever the hell you want if it is contravention of the board rules that govern the operation of the board. You need to comply the same as everyone else. Including in what you say and how you say it. A rational and reasonable person would come to a realisation about the greater good and align their behaviour, once educated about where they’re overstepping, to the smooth running requirements of the board. You MG seem to lack the capacity to do so. So you’re either an overindulged man child, or just a troll. (I’d wager that you have not had serious responsibility or status in the home, workplace, or at Church. So you come here to convince yourself that you’re a big player. It’s insecurity in real life that drives you - I’m on the money aren’t I?).

[Gadianton]

I doubt the subject material would interest you at all, Gad. Though, I think the process of studying using AI would be interesting to you. The writing portion of it was actually very fun and challenging.

I used — Chat, Grok, Gemini, Claude and a few others. They all have massive weaknesses. Only Chat had a core strength in this process : volume. Chat could handle massive data. Grok was much better at formatting than Chat — but it did not retain instructions well at all. Meaning, the formatting after 10 exchanges, may get a hard reset by Grok. No good. Not useful.

Grok wrote better formulas than Chat but could not create scientific proofs that referenced the formula table. No good. In the end.... Grok turned out to be useless for this project.

None of the bots could accurately process more than about three pages of uploaded data at a time. Full chapters could be sent to Chat and Claude. Claude couldn't do anything useful with the uploads and Chat has a massive glitch where they fill in the blanks and start guessing on what could be in the uploaded data.

Well aren't you all smart and fancy like with futuristic words like "Gemini" and "Claude" and talkin about "scientific proofs" and "data" and "formula"? Someone without one of your fancy college degrees should run this post by chat grok or whatever the “F” to figure what what the “F” it's even saying. I sure as hell don't know and I don't know how to argue with one of these damned things with all the "data sets" and "formula tables," or why I'd even want to do that in the middle of the grocery store. I only know one formula so I guess I ain't that smart. I mean, call me a dumb “F” all you want for the fact I carry my hand calculator to the liquor isle with me and keep it really simple, just look at the number on the bottle and divide by two and that tells you how good it's gonna be. I might not even be able to do that for a couple days because I hurt my hand cranking down my planer yesterday. Do you think Claude Grok “F” could tell me which way is down and which way is up if I send it a picture? And why would it even matter because I'd still have to figure out all those college words it's gonna spit back at me. Once I got my flashlight it even has an arrow that shows you which way to crank for down. Yeah, I had the cutter head unlocked.