Split from: Rethinking the AI "problem"

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Whiskey
God
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm

Split from: Rethinking the AI "problem"

Post by Whiskey »

Gadianton wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 3:40 am
MG needs AI as a stop-gap because he's outnumbered, and he will see this (in your view) as a problem from the critics, for not maintaining a welcome atmosphere for fellow believers to join in and help? Given it's the critics fault then, the AI should be allowed (from his perspective as you speculate)?

Well that, and the fact he's not a super serious student of his own beliefs. [text inserted by Whiskey but not actually part of Gadianton’s post removed. -c-]
Nobody gives flying ***** what you believe another person believes. Did you say something? Good lord Gad. Good lord. Your vinyl record is scratched.

Whiskey, do not insert your own text into the quoted text of others. -c-
Last edited by Whiskey on Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton

It is the only way.
— Whiskey
drumdude
God
Posts: 7928
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: Rethinking the AI "problem"

Post by drumdude »

Whiskey wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 3:55 am
Gadianton wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 3:40 am
MG needs AI as a stop-gap because he's outnumbered, and he will see this (in your view) as a problem from the critics, for not maintaining a welcome atmosphere for fellow believers to join in and help? Given it's the critics fault then, the AI should be allowed (from his perspective as you speculate)?

Well that, and the fact he's not a super serious student of his own beliefs. [text inserted by Whiskey but not actually part of Gadianton’s post removed. -c-]
Nobody gives flying ***** what you believe another person believes. Did you say something? Good lord Gad. Good lord. Your vinyl record is scratched.
Binger, is this you being dickish?
Whiskey
God
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm

Re: Rethinking the AI "problem"

Post by Whiskey »

drumdude wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 3:57 am
Whiskey wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 3:55 am
Nobody gives flying ***** what you believe another person believes. Did you say something? Good lord Gad. Good lord. Your vinyl record is scratched.
Binger, is this you being dickish?
No. It is me not getting another revelation from Gad. Why do you ask?
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton

It is the only way.
— Whiskey
Whiskey
God
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm

Re: Rethinking the AI "problem"

Post by Whiskey »

Whiskey wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 3:55 am
Gadianton wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 3:40 am
MG needs AI as a stop-gap because he's outnumbered, and he will see this (in your view) as a problem from the critics, for not maintaining a welcome atmosphere for fellow believers to join in and help? Given it's the critics fault then, the AI should be allowed (from his perspective as you speculate)?

Well that, and the fact he's not a super serious student of his own beliefs. [text inserted by Whiskey but not actually part of Gadianton’s post removed. -c-]
Nobody gives flying ***** what you believe another person believes. Did you say something? Good lord Gad. Good lord. Your vinyl record is scratched.

Whiskey, do not insert your own text into the quoted text of others. -c-
Lighten up hard charger. It was inside the "[" and "]". Make yourself familiar with editing tools.
Last edited by Whiskey on Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton

It is the only way.
— Whiskey
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 10481
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: Rethinking the AI "problem"

Post by canpakes »

Whiskey wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:18 am
Whiskey wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 3:55 am
Nobody gives flying ***** what you believe another person believes. Did you say something? Good lord Gad. Good lord. Your vinyl record is scratched.

Whiskey, do not insert your own text into the quoted text of others. -c-
Lighten up hard charger. It was inside the "[" and "]". Make yourself familiar with editing tools.
There’s no reason to do it, so don’t do it at all. You’ve been warned about this before, both under this account and your previous account.

Thanks. -c-

Whiskey
God
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm

Re: Rethinking the AI "problem"

Post by Whiskey »

canpakes wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:28 am
Whiskey wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:18 am
Lighten up hard charger. It was inside the "[" and "]". Make yourself familiar with editing tools.
There’s no reason to do it, so don’t do it at all. You’ve been warned about this before, both under this account and your previous account.

Thanks. -c-

Jesus Christ, panny. Instead of picking a fight and arguing, just quote the damn rule. Thanks.

My understanding is that clear edits, properly identified to abbreviate the post, were acceptable. Until you have quoted the exact rule, from the rules for this forum, please have all further moderation of this thread performed by Xeno or Shades. Thanks. I look forward to reading the exact rule, as it is posted.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton

It is the only way.
— Whiskey
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 10481
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: Rethinking the AI "problem"

Post by canpakes »

Whiskey wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:38 am
canpakes wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:28 am
There’s no reason to do it, so don’t do it at all. You’ve been warned about this before, both under this account and your previous account.

Thanks. -c-

Jesus Christ, panny. Instead of picking a fight and arguing, just quote the damn rule. Thanks.

My understanding is that clear edits, properly identified to abbreviate the post, were acceptable. Until you have quoted the exact rule, from the rules for this forum, please have all further moderation of this thread performed by Xeno or Shades. Thanks. I look forward to reading the exact rule, as it is posted.
Read through the post linked below:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1376&p=2819068&hili ... s#p2819068

You’re not the only person to have done it, and there’s a reason why Shades asked for it not to happen. No exceptions will be made for your special pleading.

Thanks. -c-
Whiskey
God
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm

Re: Rethinking the AI "problem"

Post by Whiskey »

canpakes wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:45 am
Whiskey wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:38 am

Jesus Christ, panny. Instead of picking a fight and arguing, just quote the damn rule. Thanks.

My understanding is that clear edits, properly identified to abbreviate the post, were acceptable. Until you have quoted the exact rule, from the rules for this forum, please have all further moderation of this thread performed by Xeno or Shades. Thanks. I look forward to reading the exact rule, as it is posted.
Read through the post linked below:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1376&p=2819068&hili ... s#p2819068

You’re not the only person to have done it, and there’s a reason why Shades asked for it not to happen. No exceptions will be made for your special pleading.

Thanks. -c-
Res Ipsa wrote:
Thu Jan 12, 2023 8:20 pm
So, unless you clearly indicate that you have altered the quote (often used for parody purposes) we will delete the altered quote and post a request or reminder not to do that.
Again, find the damn rule. Because if that is the basis of your edits and needling, get a grip. I indicated that i had altered the quote. I used acceptable notation within the quotation. That was the rules. I followed the rules. If that is not correct, have Xeno and Shades deal with it. Otherwise, tootles panny. Bye.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton

It is the only way.
— Whiskey
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 10481
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: Rethinking the AI "problem"

Post by canpakes »

Whiskey wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:58 am
canpakes wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:45 am


Read through the post linked below:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1376&p=2819068&hili ... s#p2819068

You’re not the only person to have done it, and there’s a reason why Shades asked for it not to happen. No exceptions will be made for your special pleading.

Thanks. -c-
Res Ipsa wrote:
Thu Jan 12, 2023 8:20 pm
So, unless you clearly indicate that you have altered the quote (often used for parody purposes) we will delete the altered quote and post a request or reminder not to do that.
Again, find the damn rule. Because if that is the basis of your edits and needling, get a grip. I indicated that i had altered the quote. I used acceptable notation within the quotation. That was the rules. I followed the rules. If that is not correct, have Xeno and Shades deal with it. Otherwise, tootles panny. Bye.
It’s not allowed. Have respect for the wishes of the board’s proprietor and check your issues at the door.

From the same post:

It's perfectly fine to disagree with a request we make, but if you keep doing what you were requested not to do, or you start a game of "please don't eat the daisies" with us, that gets us into territory where we will at least consider altering privileges.
Thanks. -c-
Whiskey
God
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm

Re: Rethinking the AI "problem"

Post by Whiskey »

canpakes wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 5:06 am
Whiskey wrote:
Mon Dec 29, 2025 4:58 am




Again, find the damn rule. Because if that is the basis of your edits and needling, get a grip. I indicated that i had altered the quote. I used acceptable notation within the quotation. That was the rules. I followed the rules. If that is not correct, have Xeno and Shades deal with it. Otherwise, tootles panny. Bye.
It’s not allowed. Have respect for the wishes of the board’s proprietor and check your issues at the door.

From the same post:

It's perfectly fine to disagree with a request we make, but if you keep doing what you were requested not to do, or you start a game of "please don't eat the daisies" with us, that gets us into territory where we will at least consider altering privileges.
Thanks. -c-
Leave it, panny. I did exactly what Shades and Res asked. I notated my edit. That is clearly within the guidelines of the so-called rule which, as you know, is not included in the actual rules of this forum. So, get out of it, you are arguing. You do not have a role here. Bye, panny.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton

It is the only way.
— Whiskey
Post Reply