Rules and Moderator information

[Marcus]

Someone was handed a participation trophy when math grades were given out back in grade school. ; )

You are having a really tough time figuring out how to be a competent moderator aren't you?

Do you realize that in the past 6 months, you have been moderated more than anyone else on the board? Everything you do as a moderator is either overturned or removed from the thread you are participating in. Consider the thread we're discussing now, you tried to enforce a rule, pretending like Whiskey was at fault, and you are so ignorant, you derailed the entire thread to enforce a "rule" you can't even back up.

Everyone here knows you choose to moderate me, Whiskey, Ceeboo, MG2.0, on the board publicly so you can "impress" your Marxist buddies like GadiSCAMton and Captain Progressive. Problem you're running into though, is you're not intelligent enough to do it without coming across as bias.

What BS.

[canpakes]

Someone was handed a participation trophy when math grades were given out back in grade school. ; )

You are having a really tough time figuring out how to be a competent moderator aren't you?

I’m good. I’m a mod; whatever. Same account for years, too.

On the other hand, this Hound account and Whiskey’s have had to be reinvented over a dozen times through socks and due to numerous suspensions, and Whiskey has had to either wipe out tens of thousands of his own posts out of embarrassment or a need for concealment, or request that Admin wipe his accounts on at least two occasions.

Somebody can’t figure out something here, and it sure isn’t me. ; )

[Whiskey]

You are having a really tough time figuring out how to be a competent moderator aren't you?

I’m good. I’m a mod; whatever. Same account for years, too.

On the other hand, this Hound account and Whiskey’s have had to be reinvented over a dozen times through socks and due to numerous suspensions, and Whiskey has had to either wipe out tens of thousands of his own posts out of embarrassment or a need for concealment, or request that Admin wipe his accounts on at least two occasions.

Somebody can’t figure out something here, and it sure isn’t me. ; )

Just get those answers you coward.

[canpakes]

I’m good. I’m a mod; whatever. Same account for years, too.

On the other hand, this Hound account and Whiskey’s have had to be reinvented over a dozen times through socks and due to numerous suspensions, and Whiskey has had to either wipe out tens of thousands of his own posts out of embarrassment or a need for concealment, or request that Admin wipe his accounts on at least two occasions.

Somebody can’t figure out something here, and it sure isn’t me. ; )

Just get those answers you coward.

Cool. An accusation of ‘coward’ coming from someone who has had to either wipe out tens of thousands of his own posts out of embarrassment or a need for concealment, or request that Admin wipe his accounts on at least two occasions.

[Whiskey]

Just get those answers you coward.

Cool. An accusation of ‘coward’ coming from someone who has had to either wipe out tens of thousands of his own posts out of embarrassment or a need for concealment, or request that Admin wipe his accounts on at least two occasions.

There you go lying again, moderator. Answer the questions.

[canpakes]

Cool. An accusation of ‘coward’ coming from someone who has had to either wipe out tens of thousands of his own posts out of embarrassment or a need for concealment, or request that Admin wipe his accounts on at least two occasions.

There you go lying again, moderator. Answer the questions.

Answers:

1. I don’t see any lies in my post. Point them out if they exist. If there are no lies here, then you’ll have no response to the challenge.

2. I don’t know nor care too much why you’ve had to either wipe out tens of thousands of your own posts out of embarrassment or a need for concealment, or request that Admin wipe your accounts on at least two occasions, but I have some ideas why. None of them reflect well on you.

Next questions?

[Whiskey]

There you go lying again, moderator. Answer the questions.

Answers:

1. I don’t see any lies in my post. Point them out if they exist. If there are no lies here, then you’ll have no response to the challenge.

2. I don’t know nor care too much why you’ve had to either wipe out tens of thousands of your own posts out of embarrassment or a need for concealment, or request that Admin wipe your accounts on at least two occasions, but I have some ideas why. None of them reflect well on you.

Next questions?

Nice deflection, moderator.

[canpakes]

Answers:

1. I don’t see any lies in my post. Point them out if they exist. If there are no lies here, then you’ll have no response to the challenge.

2. I don’t know nor care too much why you’ve had to either wipe out tens of thousands of your own posts out of embarrassment or a need for concealment, or request that Admin wipe your accounts on at least two occasions, but I have some ideas why. None of them reflect well on you.

Next questions?

Nice deflection, moderator.

Noted; you have no further questions and you are unable to make any actual case regarding ‘lies’.

Let me know if you need anything else. I can probably arrange whatever it is for a small fee.

[Whiskey]

Shades and Xeno,
Can you please address these items? Thanks.

1: "[blah blah blah]" is an unacceptable notation for a text omission within a quote? Yes/No
2: panny's partial omission of text within a quote without any notation is acceptable? Yes/No
3: panny is a moderator on this board? Yes/No

4: [ S]omeone other than [panny] reported my post prior to [panny] redlining it.

If any or all of these questions can't be addressed, I will assume that 3 is a confirmed Yes and 4 is a confirmed No.

[canpakes]

Shades and Xeno,

Can you please address these items? Thanks.

1: "[blah blah blah]" is an unacceptable notation for a text omission within a quote? Yes/No
2: panny's partial omission of text within a quote without any notation is acceptable? Yes/No
3: panny is a moderator on this board? Yes/No

4: [ S]omeone other than [panny] reported my post prior to [panny] redlining it.

If any or all of these questions can't be addressed, I will assume that 3 is a confirmed Yes and 4 is a confirmed No.

Awesome. New questions. Here are your answers:

1. Nope.
2. Whole sentences are best if quoting another poster with ID.
3. There is no mod named ‘panny’.
4. Posts don’t always need to be reported prior to being moved if a mod makes the move based on observation, and at their discretion.

What’s next?