Rules and Moderator information

[Whiskey]

So Dr.Shades, check out the image below, it's a screenshot of your moderator Canpakes intentionally trying to start a fight with me on another thread. He's intentionally trying to get me to post just so he and I can fight back and forth on the board for everyone to see. Canpakes knows I have already answered the questions He's looking for, and I answered him on the day he posted the post in the image.

I sense some projection coming from the account that has started dozens of baiting threads, each namecalling handfuls of board participants out of the blue and accusing them of silly or dangerous beliefs.

Shades and Xeno,

Hound's post highlights a pattern that has now repeated enough times that it can’t reasonably be dismissed. The issue is a moderator re-quoting his own prior post for the sole purpose of reigniting an exchange, followed immediately by a fresh insult. That is participation, escalation, and baiting. The black text may be that of a regular poster, but the green text on the posters name "canpakes" shows that this is a moderator.

I sense some projection coming from the account that has used three past accounts to chase board participants around attempting to bait and agitate them with incoherent rants and grade-school obscenities.

No, panny. It is not a projection. But your assertion, not based in facts, is a highlight of the exact point being made. It is not worth my damned time to even respond to your false presuppositions, but I am doing it because you have lampooned yourself by doing the very thing that has been shown to be a pattern or your behavior. I am sure you will escalate this with more BS. You always do.

If you want to post like this, step down as a moderator and post like this. If you want to post like this and be a moderator, delete my damned account and ban me forever. Simple really. I don't give a damn what you choose. But having a moderator who dishonestly trolls and picks fights, no matter the ink color, is a stain on the entire board and the other moderators.

eta: You can't moderate this thread. So don't.

[canpakes]

No, panny. It is not a projection. But your assertion, not based in facts, is a highlight of the exact point being made. It is not worth my damned time to even respond to your false presuppositions,

OK.

but I am doing it because you have lampooned yourself by doing the very thing that has been shown to be a pattern or your behavior. I am sure you will escalate this with more BS. You always do.

OK. You won’t reply, but you will reply. Got it.

If you want to post like this, step down as a moderator and post like this.

Can you show me the board rule that states that moderators cannot participate in board discussions, or be snarky, even?

Can you show the unfair moderation that I’ve inflicted upon you? I’ve posted a simple warning not to insert your own text into the quotes of others, and issued a timeout for spamming a thread after a split to a separate thread.

Should my behavior track closer to what you and the Hound account do here? Should that be my model? Why or why not?

If you want to post like this and be a moderator, delete my damned account and ban me forever. Simple really. I don't give a damn what you choose. But having a moderator who dishonestly trolls and picks fights, no matter the ink color, is a stain on the entire board and the other moderators.

You can’t leave this place. You need it. I’ve stated this before and you’ve proven me correct several times already.

eta: You can't moderate this thread. So don't.

I have already done so and will continue to moderate it as required.

[Whiskey]

Can you show me the board rule that states that moderators cannot participate in board discussions, or be snarky, even?

No. Is that a strawman or just you being an idiot, again? Jesus, panny. Clearly there is no rule against it. For fucksakes, is any conversation with you straightforward, ever? Be snarky and pick fights all you want, just do it without me, you clown. You are always arguing against yourself. What in the hell is wrong with you?

eta: You can't moderate this thread. So don't.

I have already done so and will continue to moderate it as required.

You are specifically required not to moderate it.

[canpakes]

Can you show me the board rule that states that moderators cannot participate in board discussions, or be snarky, even?

No. Is that a strawman or just you being an idiot, again? Jesus, panny. Clearly there is no rule against it. For fucksakes, is any conversation with you straightforward, ever? Be snarky and pick fights all you want, just do it without me, you clown. You are always arguing against yourself. What in the hell is wrong with you?

Are you requesting a safe space? You want to continue to try to antagonize or browbeat people but are offended and hurt if some other person claps back?

Can you review your posting history? Everyone else here can. Should my behavior track closer to what you and the Hound account do here? Should that be my model? Why or why not?

You are specifically required not to moderate it.

You can make that claim, but the thread will continue to be moderated if you intentionally break board rules in a misguided attempt to prove a bad point.

[Marcus]

So Dr.Shades, check out the image below, it's a screenshot of your moderator Canpakes intentionally trying to start a fight with me on another thread. He's intentionally trying to get me to post just so he and I can fight back and forth on the board for everyone to see. Canpakes knows I have already answered the questions He's looking for, and I answered him on the day he posted the post in the image.

I sense some projection coming from the account that has started dozens of baiting threads, each namecalling handfuls of board participants out of the blue and accusing them of silly or dangerous beliefs.

Shades and Xeno,

Hound's post highlights a pattern that has now repeated enough times that it can’t reasonably be dismissed. The issue is a moderator re-quoting his own prior post for the sole purpose of reigniting an exchange, followed immediately by a fresh insult. That is participation, escalation, and baiting. The black text may be that of a regular poster, but the green text on the posters name "canpakes" shows that this is a moderator.

I sense some projection coming from the account that has used three past accounts to chase board participants around attempting to bait and agitate them with incoherent rants and grade-school obscenities.

Good sensing!!
Here's another projection. In response to a discussion where he repeatedly refused to explain what he was denied, when I finally concluded that:

...when you posted this:

... Xeno and Shades, please check your PM's. I prefer to have this conversation privately, but it seems that that option has been denied as well...

...you were not telling the truth...

Whiskey responds with this:

... You are doing the cheap move where you assert something, refuse to substantiate it, and then pretend the other guy failed to explain why your assertion is wrong...

Lol. Projection at its weirdest.

[Whiskey]

You are specifically required not to moderate it.

You can make that claim, but the thread will continue to be moderated if you intentionally break board rules in a misguided attempt to prove a bad point.

It will not be moderated by you. And if I am incorrect about that, Xeno and Shades are free to delete my account. Just damned stop, panny. “F” off with your assertions about my rule breaking. You have always been arguing with your conclusions and not facts, this is not an exception.

[canpakes]

I sense some projection coming from the account that has started dozens of baiting threads, each namecalling handfuls of board participants out of the blue and accusing them of silly or dangerous beliefs.



I sense some projection coming from the account that has used three past accounts to chase board participants around attempting to bait and agitate them with incoherent rants and grade-school obscenities.

Good sensing!!
Here's another projection. In response to a discussion where he repeatedly refused to explain what he was denied, when I finally concluded that:

...when you posted this:

...you were not telling the truth...

Whiskey responds with this:

... You are doing the cheap move where you assert something, refuse to substantiate it, and then pretend the other guy failed to explain why your assertion is wrong...

Lol. Projection at its weirdest.

I don’t think that Whiskey is thinking through what would happen if I wasn’t a moderator. : D

[canpakes]

You can make that claim, but the thread will continue to be moderated if you intentionally break board rules in a misguided attempt to prove a bad point.

It will not be moderated by you. And if I am incorrect about that, Xeno and Shades are free to delete my account. Just damned stop, panny. “F” off with your assertions about my rule breaking. You have always been arguing with your conclusions and not facts, this is not an exception.

Oops. Too late. You’re wrong; I’ve already moved one of your comments when you decided to willingly violate two board rules in trying to prove a bad point.

And you know that you’re not leaving. You can’t quit me. : D

[Whiskey]

It will not be moderated by you. And if I am incorrect about that, Xeno and Shades are free to delete my account. Just damned stop, panny. “F” off with your assertions about my rule breaking. You have always been arguing with your conclusions and not facts, this is not an exception.

Oops. Too late. You’re wrong; I’ve already moved one of your comments when you decided to willingly violate two board rules in trying to prove a bad point.

And you know that you’re not leaving. You can’t quit me. : D

Xeno? Say the damned work, Xeno. Just say the damned word. Is this what you want? A moderator picking fights and telling lies? Just say the damned word. I am empathetic for how goddamn hard it is for you to say something, but still, just say the word. Do it. Ban me permanently and cut panny loose. Do it.

[canpakes]

Oops. Too late. You’re wrong; I’ve already moved one of your comments when you decided to willingly violate two board rules in trying to prove a bad point.

And you know that you’re not leaving. You can’t quit me. : D

Xeno? Say the damned work, Xeno. Just say the damned word. Is this what you want? A moderator picking fights and telling lies? Just say the damned word. I am empathetic for how goddamn hard it is for you to say something, but still, just say the word. Do it. Ban me permanently and cut panny loose. Do it.

I don’t think you’re arguing with me that you’re going to leave. You and I are in agreement that you won’t.

You’re arguing with yourself that you’re going to leave.

Anyhow, keep arguing with yourself here. I’m on to other things.