Rules and Moderator information

[Whiskey]

It's just more proof that you are not fit to be a moderator. You are unable to control your emotions. You are hunting for a fight, and that's the last thing a moderator on a discussion board is supposed to be doing.




For example, you called me a racist in a thread today, so I made the point that you as a man, use the women's restroom and I don't call you a pervert for what you do. Apparently you removed that post entirely , because I can't find it. So, you, as a moderator can call me a racist, but I can't point out that I don't call you a pervert for using the women's restroom?

Once again, im the better person for not stooping to your level, but you remove my post. That's ridiculous!

I responded to that post but I think that I overwrote it. Shades can restore it. The post you made is imaged below. You can also simply add it again to the thread.

I’m sure that you’ll invoke a conspiracy, but I already notified Shades before you even made your post here. Timestamps. : )

LMFAO.

mmmmkay. mmmhmmmmm. riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

[Hound of Heaven]

I responded to that post but I think that I overwrote it. Shades can restore it. The post you made is imaged below. You can also simply add it again to the thread.

I’m sure that you’ll invoke a conspiracy, but I already notified Shades before you even made your post here. Timestamps. : )

LMFAO.

mmmmkay. mmmhmmmmm. riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

I know you're reading this Can'tpakes, so no, I don't think it's a conspiracy, it's just more proof you aren't fit to be a moderator. There's no chance in hell you mistakenly removed my post. If you're going to call someone a racist, be prepared for what you get back.

And once again, let's all use this as a learning experience. Shades told Can'tpakes that he can't moderate in threads he's acting like a fool, because it's unfair to the board members. But look what happened here, I get called a racist by a moderator, then suddenly the post i respond back with dissappears .

Canpakes, you as a moderator have spent the entire day today acting the fool. The only way I know you're actually a moderator is because you have the ability to punish board members, and remove post you don't like .But considering how you act on the board, no one reading this discussion board would ever know you are a moderator by what you write. You have a chip on your shoulder and you hate certain board members so much you can't control yourself. Shades and Xeno are the polar opposite. They act mature, fair, and come across as willing to consider both sides. While you come across as angry, bitter and willing to hate anyone that doesn't agree with you. As a regular board member that would be fine, but as a moderator, nope!!

[Whiskey]

LMFAO.

mmmmkay. mmmhmmmmm. riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

One of the greatest series of posts ever. I really did laugh. Oh man. That was good.

[Whiskey]

What did Jersey tell Can'tpakes? I missed that apparently.

posting.php?mode=quote&f=7&p=2916078

You did not miss it.

You're not going to like this, cp but this right here: Suddenly BOOM he's jettisoned for 2 weeks via your own announcement, cp. to a witness to the interaction gives the appearance of personal bias on the part of a moderator.

As a moderator I maintained a personal policy of never taking mod action on a thread in which I was a participant. Never did it. Not once, not ever. Why? To avoid the appearance of personal bias. Mull that over and see if it's something you guys might want to consider developing within the team

[canpakes]

I responded to that post but I think that I overwrote it. Shades can restore it. The post you made is imaged below. You can also simply add it again to the thread.

I’m sure that you’ll invoke a conspiracy, but I already notified Shades before you even made your post here. Timestamps. : )

LMFAO.

mmmmkay. mmmhmmmmm. riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

Easy enough to do. When I responded I did so by accidentally hitting the edit button, thereby editing the post as opposed to replying. That makes it not your post any more. But that’s also why I have the image because I image posts being responded to.

1. If I didn’t want it seen, why would I post it here?
2. If Shades couldn’t reverse it, why would I ask him to?
3 If Shades couldn’t reverse it, why would I show you this?
4. If Shades can reverse it (as only he can), what sense would it make to delete it? It’s not like you don’t know what you’re posting and would somehow miss it in an active conversation. : D

All of your claims will fail against these 4 points. So have at it.

And, I haven’t called you racist. But your comment sure was. Your imaged post shows that you aren’t able to address that point.

[Whiskey]

Shades and Xeno are the polar opposite. They act mature, fair, and come across as willing to consider both sides.

I have seen that from Shades. As far as I know, Xeno rubberstamps and applauds panny's BS. If there is any reason to think otherwise, I have not seen it. I may be wrong. Xeno has given me no reason to believe otherwise.

[Whiskey]

LMFAO.

mmmmkay. mmmhmmmmm. riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

Easy enough to do. When I responded I did so by accidentally hitting the edit button, thereby editing the post as opposed to replying. That makes it not your post any more. But that’s also why I have the image because I image posts being responded to.

1. If I didn’t want it seen, why would I post it here?
2. If Shades couldn’t reverse it, why would I ask him to?
3 If Shades couldn’t reverse it, why would I show you this?
4. If Shades can reverse it (as only he can), what sense would it make to delete it? It’s not like you don’t know what you’re posting and would somehow miss it in an active conversation. : D

All of your claims will fail against these 4 points. So have at it.

And, I haven’t called you racist. But your comment sure was. Your imaged post shows that you aren’t able to address that point.

This story keeps getting better. Mmm. K! Thanks, panny. MMMM. K!!!!!!!!!

[Hound of Heaven]

What did Jersey tell Can'tpakes? I missed that apparently.

posting.php?mode=quote&f=7&p=2916078

You did not miss it.

You're not going to like this, cp but this right here: Suddenly BOOM he's jettisoned for 2 weeks via your own announcement, cp. to a witness to the interaction gives the appearance of personal bias on the part of a moderator.

As a moderator I maintained a personal policy of never taking mod action on a thread in which I was a participant. Never did it. Not once, not ever. Why? To avoid the appearance of personal bias. Mull that over and see if it's something you guys might want to consider developing within the team

Shades, if you're reading this, here's what we have learned today. Today Canpakes told everyone that he still has the ability as a moderator to moderate any thread he wants to, even the threads he's acting like a fool in. You see, I thought a few weeks ago you said he wasn't going to moderate threads he is a participant in, but Canpakes doesn't see it that way.

So here's where we are at! We as board members have to follow the rules or Canpakes will move, or totally delete our post, and even worse, he will ban us, even though he's acting in the same manner as we are. But Canpakes, being told by you, that he can't moderate threads he's participating in, doesn't care about you telling him not to moderate in threads he's a participant.

So this entire scenario proves exactly what I've been saying about him and his narcissistic personality, he believes we have to follow the rules, but he doesn't. Today, he essentially spit in your face, Shades, when he admitted to Whiskey that he would still moderate threads he's fighting with board members in!!







Shades, i know you can see and feel the tension between Canpakes and Whiskey. Can you please consider not allowing Canpakes to use his moderating powers against Whiskey? This entire situation has become totally ridiculous and Canpakes as a moderator that doesn't have the ability to control his emotions is at fault, more fault than Whiskey, and it's unfair that he can moderate Whiskey while at the same time criticizing every post Whiskey makes! Canpakes is actively everyday hunting for a fight, and when someone responds, he has no problem abusing his moderator powers to get the outcome he wants. Please, allow him to be a moderator for now, but get him as a moderator away from Whiskey.

[Whiskey]

Please, allow him to be a moderator for now, but get him as a moderator away from Whiskey.

I appreciate the nod, Hound. Thank you. Respectfully, I am not interested in staying if panny has green font on his name, access to the moderator forum, and can't be added to the foe list. It is not fair to the other members of the forum to have panny lobbing BS insults at me or anyone else, assuming a lack of defense is admission (as he confirmed earlier today) and still being able to moderate the forum.

It is not personal. If panny can't be added to the foe list, delete my account. Simple, simple, simple. I am sure everyone here understands.

[Hound of Heaven]

LMFAO.

mmmmkay. mmmhmmmmm. riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

Easy enough to do. When I responded I did so by accidentally hitting the edit button, thereby editing the post as opposed to replying. That makes it not your post any more. But that’s also why I have the image because I image posts being responded to.

1. If I didn’t want it seen, why would I post it here?
2. If Shades couldn’t reverse it, why would I ask him to?
3 If Shades couldn’t reverse it, why would I show you this?
4. If Shades can reverse it (as only he can), what sense would it make to delete it? It’s not like you don’t know what you’re posting and would somehow miss it in an active conversation. : D

All of your claims will fail against these 4 points. So have at it.

And, I haven’t called you racist. But your comment sure was. Your imaged post shows that you aren’t able to address that point.

Hey Shades, what your moderator Canpakes did here is very easy to miss, if you don't read the post carefully. Canpakes is responding to Whiskey, and at the very end of his post, he insinuates that Whiskey is me, by saying that he didn't call Whiskey a racist. What he's implying is that Whiskey and I are the same person. Is what Canpakes the moderator, on a moderator thread, is what he's doing by implying Whiskey and I are the same person, something a moderator should be doing, especially on a thread for board members to ask questions to the moderators?

Isn't this the one thread Canpakes should be acting like he's actually a moderator, instead of a butt hurt narcissist?