Scholars of the Far Right

[Hound of Heaven]

https://youtu.be/lLGvjJH-3AQ?si=rkTySOdlywbR3KHj

Inside the religion of Progressivism there is a group of insane wackos that call themselves "Far Right Scholars." And these people are just about as insane as the progressives on this board that have a hatred for Mormons.

The idiot in the image above fled to Canada to get away from Trump’s America and now this person is on the internet begging for money and housing because she's finding out that Canada is more expensive than living in Los Angeles!!

She's asking for free housing or possibly reduced rent, yes, months in Canada and this progressive idiot wants other people to give her money because she made a mistake moving to a country that is more expensive to live in than America!

I started this thread so we can study the mindset of these deranged progressive idiots that consider themselves scholars of the far right. We're going to figure out why they are so ignorant, is it their progressive cult religion that makes them deranged, or is it something else? I'm betting that it's the progressive brain washing that is turning normal people into deranged idiots much like this person and many of the idiots that post to this board.

There's plenty of content out there with these so called Scholars, this is going be fun.

[huckelberry]

Well this person sounds as goofy as Hound. I hope they are both performing goofiness and are continuing real life some where close enough to return to.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

As you may know, I have the HoH on Ignore, so I can’t read whatever retarded fart bubble someone else created that it felt the need to post here. In case anyone is interested, there is, in fact, a ‘far right scholar’ named Cas Mudde who is respected in academic and political circles, which automatically makes him the enemy of people who hate to read. He’s argued that the radical right is better understood as a form of populist radicalism - I believe Res Ipsa touched on this a few times here and there - not a replay of fascism a la Naziism. He defines populism narrowly as a surprisingly narrow ideology that divides society into the “pure people” versus the “corrupt elite,” and says it attaches itself to thicker ideologies like nationalism. In his framework, the key core of the radical right is nativism, authoritarianism, and populism working together. An even tighter brand is the anti-Jewish form we’ve seen in Nick Fuente’s movement. ChatGPT summary follows:

“In Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, he pushes back against lazy explanations that blame everything on economic anxiety or voter irrationality. He shows these parties are often structured, strategic, and ideologically coherent. They don’t just erupt out of nowhere. They grow when mainstream parties create openings, especially around immigration, identity, and distrust of institutions.

In later work, especially on the American and European cases, he emphasizes normalization. The biggest shift is not fringe extremists taking over, but mainstream actors adopting radical right frames. Once ideas about exclusionary nationalism or minority threat move into conventional politics, the boundary between “extreme” and “normal” blurs. For him, the danger isn’t just the loud outsiders. It’s when their language becomes routine.”

MAGA, in this instance, are less a revolutionaries and more of a case study with red hats. I recommend picking up The Far Right Today, 2019. Non-academic language. Midwits, unironically, will enjoy it.

[Res Ipsa]

As you may know, I have the HoH on Ignore, so I can’t read whatever retarded fart bubble someone else created that it felt the need to post here. In case anyone is interested, there is, in fact, a ‘far right scholar’ named Cas Mudde who is respected in academic and political circles, which automatically makes him the enemy of people who hate to read. He’s argued that the radical right is better understood as a form of populist radicalism - I believe Res Ipsa touched on this a few times here and there - not a replay of fascism a la Naziism. He defines populism narrowly as a surprisingly narrow ideology that divides society into the “pure people” versus the “corrupt elite,” and says it attaches itself to thicker ideologies like nationalism. In his framework, the key core of the radical right is nativism, authoritarianism, and populism working together. An even tighter brand is the anti-Jewish form we’ve seen in Nick Fuente’s movement. ChatGPT summary follows:

“In Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, he pushes back against lazy explanations that blame everything on economic anxiety or voter irrationality. He shows these parties are often structured, strategic, and ideologically coherent. They don’t just erupt out of nowhere. They grow when mainstream parties create openings, especially around immigration, identity, and distrust of institutions.

In later work, especially on the American and European cases, he emphasizes normalization. The biggest shift is not fringe extremists taking over, but mainstream actors adopting radical right frames. Once ideas about exclusionary nationalism or minority threat move into conventional politics, the boundary between “extreme” and “normal” blurs. For him, the danger isn’t just the loud outsiders. It’s when their language becomes routine.”

MAGA, in this instance, are less a revolutionaries and more of a case study with red hats. I recommend picking up The Far Right Today, 2019. Non-academic language. Midwits, unironically, will enjoy it.

Sounds interesting.