With whom MG 2.0 will or won't interact.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8273
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: With whom MG 2.0 will or won't interact.

Post by MG 2.0 »

I am absolutely fascinated that I attract so much attention from trolls that follow my every move. I really don't deserve it. A while back a number of those folks that troll me from place to place had said they would no longer interact with me and put me on ignore.

That didn't happen.

Regards,
MG
Marcus
God
Posts: 7967
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: With whom MG 2.0 will or won't interact.

Post by Marcus »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Apr 10, 2026 5:13 am
I am absolutely fascinated that I attract so much attention from trolls that follow my every move. I really don't deserve it. A while back a number of those folks that troll me from place to place had said they would no longer interact with me and put me on ignore.

That didn't happen.

Regards,
MG
Also mentalgymnast:
MG 2.0 wrote:
Wed Apr 08, 2026 4:39 pm
A reminder. I will not engage with the two previous posters. Their track record will not allow me to spend time with them. There is nothing productive that comes of it...
Mentalgymnasts have a hard time sticking with a position, but they are stellar at projecting their behavior onto others.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4051
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: With whom MG 2.0 will or won't interact.

Post by I Have Questions »

To be clear and to clarify, when MG states that he will no longer interact with certain individuals what he means is he will not reply directly to their posts, nor quote what they’ve actually said and to which he is responding. He’s doing the equivalent of loudly announcing that he’s not talking to someone in the room, but eavesdrops their conversations and responds to it by talking loudly to someone else in the room in the hopes they will hear what he’s saying. It’s classic behaviour for an insecure troll who knows he cannot hold his own in a direct conversation. It’s very Trump-like behaviour.
Last edited by I Have Questions on Fri Apr 10, 2026 1:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
User avatar
Limnor
God
Posts: 1575
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2023 12:55 am

Re: With whom MG 2.0 will or won't interact.

Post by Limnor »

Seems like a continuation of his approach and lack of accountability for his words. He can’t really disengage from something he never engaged with directly in the first place.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8273
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

From "How often 'plates' are discussed here."

Post by MG 2.0 »

My personal opinion, for whatever it's worth, is that this board would be a much more enjoyable place if there wasn't a self appointed ...and apparently anointed...board nanny that essentially controls the flow of conversations in threads.

"Now, back to the topic." She says.

What???

That is controlling...to the max. Yet folks don't seem to mind that shenanigans.

And some might wonder why this place becomes an echo chamber. It's not hard to figure that out. When speech is regulated and people are explicitly called "yahoos" for expressing their opinions and speculation, etc , that squelches free speech.

I made a response to gadianton. If he takes issue with anything I've said, fine. I don't think he needs a board nanny to come to his rescue.

My two cents.

Regards,
MG
User avatar
Limnor
God
Posts: 1575
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2023 12:55 am

Re: How often "plates" are discussed here.

Post by Limnor »

Says the guy that “grants permission” for rights.
Post Reply