Election Litigation Status

[Brack]

There is no one contributing to this forum who is more dishonest than you--certainly not canpakes, and I strongly suspect that even you know that. Your characterizing him as dishonest is just about the most egregious and outstanding case of projection I can think of.

Hey, one time - during my adorable little kid stage around 5 years old or so - I shoplifted one-half of a set of dice from a convenience store. I’m not as innocent as I appear to be.

5 years old is still before the age of accountability, which is 8 years old.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

And on the other side of that Patriot's Prayer throbbing member is subjenius' maw wide open, salivating at the thought that the man pictured is dutifully wearing his MAGA hat.

- Doc

[Res Ipsa]

Thursday updates:

In the Georgia Krakken lawsuit, the 11th Circuit ordered briefing on whether it has jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Plaintiffs filed filed their brief on juridiction and a brief on the merits of their appeal. Plaintiffs have filed their brief. https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/s ... -election/

New Wisconsin lawsuit filed by Trump in Federal Court. Just Trump. Not Pence. Not the campaign. The complaint seeks a declaration that a number of actions by the state elections commissions and mayors in five cities violated the constitution, and asks the court to remand the case to the state legislature so that it can devise a proper remedy. The lawyers are a firm in Indiana, a firm I've never noticed before this case.

Republicans have filed election contests for the Senate race and five house races in Minnesota, as well as a lawsuit for an extended audit.

The Krakken has surfaced in the middle of the desert. Krakken IV has been filed in Arizona. Same basic complaint, same request for TRO. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-cont ... int-AZ.pdf

In the Arizona election contest, the initial inspection of 100 damaged ballots found one ballot that had been transcribed incorrectly (changing Trump to Biden) and one where the voter had filled in the bubble for Trump and had voted for Trump as a write-in candidate. Plaintiff claims the latter was not counted as an "overbite" but was supposed to be counted. Plaintiff has moved for a continuance of the trial/hearing, which was set for today and a more extensive survey of the damaged ballots (or even a complete canvas, depending on how many damaged ballots there are).

The Wisconsin Supreme Court has dismissed the Trump campaign's petition that requested relief under the court's original jurisdiction. It did the same with the other original jurisdiction lawsuit.

[subgenius]

But, please - tell us more about your fake ‘honesty’. Lol. : D

honestly, watching you move from asking for "examples", to asking for "evidence", and then to asking for "proof"...and now back to you asking for examples has been a good time.
But, as usual and on cue, the peanut gallery drops in to attack the messenger.

[subgenius]

... I might claim that subgenius has a scant regard for truth and rational argument. But someone who correctly said "Chap has claimed that subgenius has a scant regard for truth and rational argument" would merely be reporting on what I had said. He would not 'literally' be saying that subgenius had a scant regard for truth and rational argument.

Similar to this is subbie’s belief that affidavits equal ‘proof’.

Take you overly developed wrist muscles and cite that post where i say affidavits are "proof", and do so without noticing the posts where i emphatically note them as being evidence.

[canpakes]

honestly, watching you move from asking for "examples", to asking for "evidence", and then to asking for "proof"...and now back to you asking for examples has been a good time.
But, as usual and on cue, the peanut gallery drops in to attack the messenger.

I’ve always asked for examples of what you claim exists - specifically, widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud.

You, in turn, have provided nothing of the sort.

And you still can’t come right out and say that you believe that widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud exists ... because you don’t even believe it yourself.

Really, both of these are simple requests, especially the second one. I can’t imagine why you can’t nut up and openly state what you believe about this. ; )

[canpakes]

Similar to this is subbie’s belief that affidavits equal ‘proof’.

Take you overly developed wrist muscles and cite that post where i say affidavits are* "proof", and do so without noticing the posts where i emphatically note them as being evidence.

*Well, there you go again - more proof that you can’t read.

Evidence of what?

From another thread:

Channel 2 confirmed Price registered to vote the day after he made the speech, using his brother’s Hiram address and swearing to an affidavit that he was a Georgia resident and eligible to vote.

C/P for subs, who places so much faith in affidavits. ; )

Now, when are you going to find your nutsack and state that you actually believe that there was widespread use of narrow and targeted voter fraud in this election?

C’mon, don’t be a spineless snowflake. You can do it!

[Gunnar]

5 years old is still before the age of accountability, which is 8 years old.

Oh, that's right! I should have considered that! Canpakes is hereby exonerated!

[Jersey Girl]

There is no one contributing to this forum who is more dishonest than you--certainly not canpakes, and I strongly suspect that even you know that. Your characterizing him as dishonest is just about the most egregious and outstanding case of projection I can think of.

Hey, one time - during my adorable little kid stage around 5 years old or so - I shoplifted one-half of a set of dice from a convenience store. I’m not as innocent as I appear to be.

I bet you cut your hair, too.

[Gunnar]

I bet you cut your hair, too.

What does that have to do with the case?