SeN: "Hope for immortality" is a Useful Salve for Childhood "rape and strangulation."

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

I love that MG’s response perfectly illustrates the “they don’t read” reality we have for people like him. If he had read Chap’s copypasta he wouldn’t have posted what he did.

eta: Also, the lying. They lie a LOT.

- Doc

[mentalgymnast]

I love that MG’s response perfectly illustrates the “they don’t read” reality we have for people like him. If had read Chap’s copypasta he wouldn’t have posted what he did.

- Doc

I read it. And like I said, if you read what I said, I’ve read this information before. My question to Chap...and you (if you choose)...still stands.

Please don’t take cheap shots. It’s beneath you. Or is it?

Regards,
MG

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

No, you didn’t. Skimming over something, and then picking a snippet out of it to read isn’t reading. Anyway. Once again you’re lying. I don’t know how you pass your temple recommend interviews in good conscience.

- Doc

[mentalgymnast]

No, you didn’t. Once again you’re lying. I don’t know how you pass your temple recommend interviews in good conscience.

- Doc

Cheap shot. Doc, I can’t remember EVER having a substantive discussion with you. You are so predictable. Keep it coming if you must...but you’re simply derailing and avoiding a question that you would really rather not consider.

Care to?

Regards,
MG

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Sure, once you actually read Chap’s quoted material, fully, and then rework your damned response you lying dickhole.

- Doc

[Chap]

If you were God, what improvements would you make that would make us uniquely different than what we are as a race, that would improve on the 1.0 model that we see in this world?

Well dealing with one of the obvious flaws in the human body listed in my post would be a start. Wasn't that pretty freaking obvious? Not to MG, it appears?

(But what does he mean by that heavily emphasised word 'uniquely'? Any ideas? I mean, different is .. different, no? Naaah, it's just part of his usual shtick of trying to wriggle out of a losing battle by setting up a 'but why won't you answer my question?' ploy.)

[mentalgymnast]

Sure, once you actually read Chap’s quoted material, fully, and then rework your freakin’ response you lying dickhole.

- Doc

Again, I read it. This isn't anything new to me.

This is the dilemma that you folks run into. When you take up the mantle of secular atheism you're forced into a corner where you then resort to mediocre replies without engaging the argument.

I probably would have been better off not responding to you. Let's see what Chap has to say.

OK?

We're not going anywhere. And you're just being nasty.

Thanks,
MG

[Chap]

Let's see what Chap has to say.

Um, see the post preceding yours?

Look, you tell me that intelligent life on another planet would have to look like human beings, because you regard the design he gave us as the creator's best shot, never to be improved. OK?

I pointed out that as a design, the human body is a mess. I mean, even octopuses have better designed eyes than we do. So if there is a designer, why couldn't he have done better elsewhere? And remember, your point was 'why should the creator change the design elsewhere when he already got it right on earth?'. But he very obviously did NOT get it right here.

So what becomes of your argument that all intelligent life must have the same body design as ours 'because the creator got it right first time'?

(I appreciate that this conclusion does cause major problems for a major plank of Mormon theology, but that's your problem, not mine.)

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

No you the “F” didn't. “F”. This is why people get upset with you, you goddamned liar. Now re-read the damned copypasta, and then re-work your retarded damned answer to Chap.

And next time you damned have a damned worthiness interview, I want you to think about this exchange and hopefully you'll damned repent and work that crap out with your clergy.

- Doc

[Lem]

Thanks for that post about Lents' book, Chap, I had heard a lot of it before but that was quite interesting to see it again. Very thorough answer to the question at hand.

If you were God, what improvements would you make that would make us uniquely different than what we are as a race, that would improve on the 1.0 model that we see in this world?

Well dealing with one of the obvious flaws in the human body listed in my post would be a start. Wasn't that pretty freaking obvious? Not to MG, it appears?

(But what does he mean by that heavily emphasised word 'uniquely'? Any ideas? ...

I have an idea what it means.

...Trolls are usually never initiators of a new semantic trend of communication. Conversely, they normally respond, parasitically, to a fragment of discourse that has been created by someone else.... trolls do not initiate discourse but respond to it for the simple reason that they do not care about any particular semantic focus. They are not interested in what they write about; they are interested in the cognitive, emotional, and pragmatic reactions that they can obtain....

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q ... kWxm4KylOd