Time For a Fresh MADbanning Poll!

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.

Who's Next to be Banned?

 
Total votes: 0

_Who Knows
_Emeritus
Posts: 2455
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm

Post by _Who Knows »

asbestosman wrote:
Sethbag wrote:On the other hand, I didn't get invited to be in the "spam buster" group and some of the more polite critics did, so that shows I'm not exactly on their Christmas Card list either.

I wouldn't take it personally. Most TBMs didn't get invited either. I suspect they asked me for two reasons: 1) I often reported spam in the past, and 2) I have also reported a security issue they once had. I think they chose me because I have established myself as tending to report such problems.


Do you get cool new Spambuster avatars? Image

I thought it looked like they picked people who were online the most.

But AMan, I'm sure they picked you for your expertise. :)
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

Runtu wrote:[...] I could see him or Tarski getting the axe.


Tarski is usually pretty calm and calculated (and somewhat forgiving of ignorance), but lately I sense he is growing wearier of believers.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

Who Knows wrote:Do you get cool new Spambuster avatars?
No, but I hear there's a theme song in the works: Spam, spam, spam, spam,

I thought it looked like they picked people who were online the most.

Doh, there goes my ego.
But AMan, I'm sure they picked you for your expertise. :)

Whew, thanks for saving my over-inflated sense of self-importance. I'd hate to think they only picked me because I'm a hopeless message board addict.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

asbestosman wrote:
Who Knows wrote:Do you get cool new Spambuster avatars?
No, but I hear there's a theme song in the works: Spam, spam, spam, spam,


You mean this kinda Spam?
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
Runtu wrote:[...] I could see him or Tarski getting the axe.


Tarski is usually pretty calm and calculated (and somewhat forgiving of ignorance), but lately I sense he is growing wearier of believers.


I really doubt Tarski gets banned. He's part of the Criticizing Trinity (as Scratch once coined him, Dale, and Dude).
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Bond...James Bond wrote:
Doctor Steuss wrote:
Runtu wrote:[...] I could see him or Tarski getting the axe.


Tarski is usually pretty calm and calculated (and somewhat forgiving of ignorance), but lately I sense he is growing wearier of believers.


I really doubt Tarski gets banned. He's part of the Criticizing Trinity (as Scratch once coined him, Dale, and Dude).


Did I really do that? If so, I feel bad that I left out Dan Vogel and Brent Metcalfe, who are also extremely important (and probably unbannable) critics.
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

Mister Scratch wrote:Did I really do that?

In your Dossier of Uncle Dale.
If so, I feel bad that I left out Dan Vogel and Brent Metcalfe, who are also extremely important (and probably unbannable) critics.

Don Bradley is an extremely important (and amazing) contribution to the board as well in my not-so-humble opinion.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Mister Scratch wrote:
Did I really do that? If so, I feel bad that I left out Dan Vogel and Brent Metcalfe, who are also extremely important (and probably unbannable) critics.


Yep..Here..and there's only one way to make amends. Dossier #38: Dan Vogel, Dossier #39: Tarski. ;) *hint, hint*
Last edited by Anonymous on Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:Did I really do that?

In your Dossier of Uncle Dale.
If so, I feel bad that I left out Dan Vogel and Brent Metcalfe, who are also extremely important (and probably unbannable) critics.

Don Bradley is an extremely important (and amazing) contribution to the board as well in my not-so-humble opinion.


Yes, you're quite right, Steuss. And this kind of post is exactly why I have said many times that the blog is very much dependent upon the contributions of wonderful fellow posters (a.k.a. "little birdies") such as you and Bond. Thanks for the tip, Stu!
Post Reply