beastie wrote:He was severely mentally ill. He needed medical intervention, and it should have been involuntary, given the extreme concern of so many around him and the judgment of the court.
Isn't our modern society great? All this knowledge being wasted.
Fort, I agree with you on many points, but this sort of mental illness is likely completely biological in origin. Yes, its expression is dependent on environmental triggers, so living in an urban, faceless, violence-soaked environment pushed him in this direction, while in a more tribal environment there may have been a different expression. I suspect it would still have been violent, but not the massacre that the guns allowed. However, I seriously doubt that biologically originated mental illnesses didn't exist in the tribal environment. It's a genetic flaw. It existed, and given the predictable nature of the expression of certain mental illness, its expression in the tribal environment was probably not alien to this expression.
I don't believe that either you or I can sit here and evaluate to what extent his final pathology was biological or environmental in origin. I'm entirely prepared to accept a biological predisposition, but that predisposition was manifestly exacerbated by his environment. He was a product of his environment. A different environment would have diffused or disarmed his initial pathological tendency.
Yes guns enable large scale
group killings, but serial killers don't need guns. Jack the Ripper managed a horrific record of killings using only a knife. Serial killers are not an ancient phenomenon. They are a modern phenomenon. They are manufactured by society, carefully groomed and nurtured to flashpoint, and then helpfully equipped with the tools they need to get out there and kill on a large scale.
If serial killers were simply a biological aberration which occur once every X number of births, then this would be revealed by a certain distribution pattern within societies in human history. But the fact is that we have societies which have existed for thousands of years and which have never experienced serial killers, whilst we have societies which have existed for less than 150 years and have experienced almost all the serial killers in recorded human history. There can be no doubt that certain societies will always experience serial killers, whilst certain societies never will.
I maintain that the greatest flaw this incident revealed was the weakness within the US health system.
I believe that's a serious flaw, but not the most important flaw. That this pathology was developed by the society is a far more serious flaw.
Regarding gun control, I really don't know what to think, but it does give me pause that so many other countries seem to agree that the US system in that regard is a problem that contributed to this incident. The US has a tendency to be egocentric and refuse to listen to other countries. We should know better by now. We should start listening.
Good points.
Lazy research debunked: bcspace x 4 | maklelan x 3 | Coggins7 x 5 (by Mr. Coffee x5) | grampa75 x 1 | whyme x 2 | rcrocket x 2 | Kerry Shirts x 1 | Enuma Elish x 1|