Interview of Nelson & Wickman re LDS in American Society

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_JAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:04 pm

You are a Victim

Post by _JAK »

The Nehor wrote:
Lucretia MacEvil wrote:
Coggins7 wrote:
I was taught that God used materials from other worlds to make ours, and that's how we happen to have stuff over 6,000 years old.



That's nice. Its also irrelevant. Its not official Church doctrine and never was.


It was taught. It is relevant.

Nobody can pin down Mormon doctrine, but we do know what we were taught.


Everyone seems to forget the verification by God portion of good teaching.

I was taught last year that God made all stellar bodies round and that is why there are no square or rectangular ones like you expect. Just smile, nod, and move on.


You are the epitome of one who has been indoctrinated. You appear to have very limited capacity to think to use your brain for something other than a receptacle for religious dogma others pour into it.

JAK
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Post by _Gazelam »

God made all stellar bodies round and that is why there are no square or rectangular ones like you expect. Just smile, nod, and move on.


That statement is obviously evidence of a stupor of thought.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Coggins7 wrote:Mercury is in reality either:

1. MrCoffee

2. Vegasrefugee

3 PP

4. Whoopie Godlberg drinking J&B or

5. A poor reincarnation of Sam Kinnison


He is the former Vegas Refugee...he got a name change (his posts transfer over)
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: You are a Victim

Post by _The Nehor »

JAK wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
Lucretia MacEvil wrote:
Coggins7 wrote:
I was taught that God used materials from other worlds to make ours, and that's how we happen to have stuff over 6,000 years old.



That's nice. Its also irrelevant. Its not official Church doctrine and never was.


It was taught. It is relevant.

Nobody can pin down Mormon doctrine, but we do know what we were taught.


Everyone seems to forget the verification by God portion of good teaching.

I was taught last year that God made all stellar bodies round and that is why there are no square or rectangular ones like you expect. Just smile, nod, and move on.


You are the epitome of one who has been indoctrinated. You appear to have very limited capacity to think to use your brain for something other than a receptacle for religious dogma others pour into it.

JAK


Funny, everyone who knows me thinks differently, both LDS and non-LDS. I've been defined by many as eccentric in fact. I accept the description. I am passionate and have a rich fantasy life.

Your worldview does not fulfil me JAK. I have desires that can never be fulfilled on this Earth and I know that. Either the Universe is a cheat or I was made for a better world. If that limits my thinking then by all means limit it more. I do not think it does. When I'm engaged in real prayer the thoughts and images fly fast and quick. It is not a tranquil experience. If my mind is not in top form I go into a form of mental overload.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

Lucretia MacEvil wrote:
rcrocket wrote:
Lucretia MacEvil wrote:
Coggins7 wrote:
I was taught that God used materials from other worlds to make ours, and that's how we happen to have stuff over 6,000 years old.



That's nice. Its also irrelevant. Its not official Church doctrine and never was.


It was taught. It is relevant.

Nobody can pin down Mormon doctrine, but we do know what we were taught.


Well, I heard my mother telling me this, but I'd like chapter and verse from you or Scratch to support the statement above.

rcrocket


I think we all know that many teachings of the church don't have chapter and verse. I remember hearing it the first time in Seminary, never mind how many years ago. Are you going to say it's irrelevant too?


I think what the Apologists are saying is that as young children, teenagers, and even adults we were/are supposed to ignore the teachings of our Primary, Sunday School, and Seminary teachers. We should have known that they were just making stuff up. It was all their personal opinions. The fact that so many church teachers just happen to be teaching the exact same pseudo-doctrines is just a silly coincidence.
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
_silentkid
_Emeritus
Posts: 1606
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by _silentkid »

Coggins:

After thinking about it for a while, I may have come to an understanding of the point you were trying to make with your dog/reptile comments. I had assumed that you were claiming that evolution taught that dogs descended directly from reptiles. This is obviously not the case. Mammals share a common ancestor with reptiles around 290 million years ago. Dogs then evolved from a mammalian ancestor (think branching, like a tree). I think your post was an attempt at arguing nomenclature, the whole dogs aren't dogs until they're dogs thing. I'm not really sure. Anyhow, if I misunderstood your post, I apologize. I still like the statement you made that I'm using as a quote.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

SatanWasSetUp wrote:
Lucretia MacEvil wrote:
rcrocket wrote:
Lucretia MacEvil wrote:
Coggins7 wrote:
I was taught that God used materials from other worlds to make ours, and that's how we happen to have stuff over 6,000 years old.



That's nice. Its also irrelevant. Its not official Church doctrine and never was.


It was taught. It is relevant.

Nobody can pin down Mormon doctrine, but we do know what we were taught.


Well, I heard my mother telling me this, but I'd like chapter and verse from you or Scratch to support the statement above.

rcrocket


I think we all know that many teachings of the church don't have chapter and verse. I remember hearing it the first time in Seminary, never mind how many years ago. Are you going to say it's irrelevant too?


I think what the Apologists are saying is that as young children, teenagers, and even adults we were/are supposed to ignore the teachings of our Primary, Sunday School, and Seminary teachers. We should have known that they were just making stuff up. It was all their personal opinions. The fact that so many church teachers just happen to be teaching the exact same pseudo-doctrines is just a silly coincidence.


It's because these pseudo-explanations get passed around.

You're supposed to grow beyond what you were taught in Primary, Sunday School, and Seminary. That's a juvenile understanding of the Gospel that has served it's purpose only if you keep going. In High School my simplistic understanding of history was blown to pieces and replaced. In College it happened again. It is still going on now in my own private studies.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_silentkid
_Emeritus
Posts: 1606
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by _silentkid »

And then you move beyond the mythical claims of religion. It's a natural progression.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

silentkid wrote:And then you move beyond the mythical claims of religion. It's a natural progression.


Glad you agree with me. Unless you meant to say that all religious claims are mythical.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_silentkid
_Emeritus
Posts: 1606
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by _silentkid »

Any religious claims that can be tested by empirical means and fail to hold up to such scrutiny are mythical. Those that cannot be tested are left up to the discretion of the believer. ;)
Post Reply