Ray A: The Gandhi of Internet Mormonism?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Beastie, I'm sorry to have to tell you that I'm not going to publicly condemn Ray or anybody else merely because you request it.

I haven't paid any attention to this issue of yours. I don't know much about it, and I'm not particularly interested. I know Ray. I've been in his home. I've met his daughter. I feel quite comfortable with him.

If you're really fascinated with the matter, you deal with it. And if you really, really want to drag me into your personal spats, you deal with the inevitable disappointment.

I hope you have a pleasant Winter Solstice.


Of course you're not going to publicly condemn Ray, although he said something far, far worse than others whom you HAVE publicly condemned, and "diagnosed".

You're just not interested.

You are, however, "fascinated" by the repulsive behavior of RFM, even when it's far milder than what Ray expressed.

And does anyone doubt for a nanosecond that if an RFMer, or a critic from here, were to engage in the rank hypocrisy Ray engaged in with this statement:

If some dork speaks about "killing Mormon missionaries", I do not care a fig if anyone else sees this as merely words. I take this very seriously. And to all the little minds who think this thread has no substance - THINK AGAIN! And to all of you who quote Jesus, remember that out of the mouth come blasphemies, threats, and bile, which reflect the intentions of the heart. This is a verbal hatred that could one day turn to physical violence. And the more you speak and publish your BILE, the more the sick minds will be encouraged.


you would point out the hypocrisy and vile sentiments with relish, and pretend that it's some sort of statement about "recovery" from Mormonism?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

beastie wrote:You are, however, "fascinated" by the repulsive behavior of RFM, even when it's far milder than what Ray expressed.


You HAVE to be kidding!! This just shows how deep in the sand your head is buried.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

beastie wrote:And does anyone doubt for a nanosecond that if an RFMer, or a critic from here, were to engage in the rank hypocrisy Ray engaged in with this statement:

If some dork speaks about "killing Mormon missionaries", I do not care a fig if anyone else sees this as merely words. I take this very seriously. And to all the little minds who think this thread has no substance - THINK AGAIN! And to all of you who quote Jesus, remember that out of the mouth come blasphemies, threats, and bile, which reflect the intentions of the heart. This is a verbal hatred that could one day turn to physical violence. And the more you speak and publish your BILE, the more the sick minds will be encouraged.


you would point out the hypocrisy and vile sentiments with relish, and pretend that it's some sort of statement about "recovery" from Mormonism?


You know, I just have to say: Wow. Ray truly is a complete and utter whack-job, and it really should come as no surprise to him that his credibility is in shambles. His flip-flopping, his volatile temper---they all add up to a very disturbing instability. Does he realize that he was the very "dork" who spoke those words? Did his "verbal hatred" turn to "physical violence"? Hmmm....
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

I want to remind you, Ray, that I became The Enemy to you when I publicly opposed your (now incredibly hypocritical) assertion that the volatile sentiments expressed on the internet by "angry exmormons" would result in some quasi-mormon-holocaust - and up to that time, you and I had been quite friendly and had sided together on most topics. Yet I still opposed you when you said something I deemed patently ridiculous.

I'm on the same side as SLCabbie (the one you now applaud for saying I'm the product of incest for refusing to accept his assertions about Joseph Smith' narcissism), and Steve Benson, and have stood up to both of them.

And if merc ever said anything remotely like "YOUR F***ING MISSIONARIES ARE DEAD" and I was around to read it, I'd stand up to him, too.

Your defenses are pathetic, and Dan's truly apparent hypocrisy and double standard are equally pathetic.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Mister Scratch wrote:You know, I just have to say: Wow. Ray truly is a complete and utter whack-job, and it really should come as no surprise to him that his credibility is in shambles. His flip-flopping, his volatile temper---they all add up to a very disturbing instability. Does he realize that he was the very "dork" who spoke those words? Did his "verbal hatred" turn to "physical violence"? Hmmm....


How can you talk about "credibility" when you lied, denied you lied for days, then admitted you lied? That admission went a long way to redeeming you a little. But you would not have admitted it unless I kept bringing the subject up. To this day you would have denied it.

I'm not talking about five years ago, I'm talking about five hours ago. Will you stop lying in future?
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

Mister Scratch wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:
The Nehor wrote:You are clearly very angry and you allowed your white-hot wrath to bubble over in a very pathetic way. I mean, why go on the extended diatribe at all?


I didn't. I put up the offending post, and expressed my disapproval of it.

What was the usefulness of that? Why was it necessary for you to repeatedly use Bill "Anti-Semite" Hamblin?


Where've I done that, Nehor? I'm going to have to CFR you again, since you are obviously flailing about in desperation at this point.

Could you have gotten your basic point across without it? Yes, of course you could have. But you didn't. Instead, you let your anger get the better of you, and you went ballistic.


But.... I didn't 'go ballistic.' I merely posted the diatribe and commented on it. Certainly, there wasn't a long string of offensive epithets in my post!

You were over-the-top, and are behaving in a very juvenile and offensive way. I think you should apologize.


Next time bring your "A-game," Nehor.


Correction: You put up the offending post and harp on it every chance you get.

While I can't prove it I suspect you have not to this point mentioned Bill Hamblin since then without bringing this up.


Uh huh. It is all fine and dandy, Nehor, for you to sling accusations which you cannot prove. Good show, old chap!

No, but there most likely was a string of profanity in your PM to Ray.


Am I surprised that you would say this after I have just checkmated you? No, not really.


It is an accusation I can't prove. However will you deny that you routinely use Bill 'Anti-Semite' Hamblin and other terms regularly? I came up with 4 instances of this or things like it and I didn't even look hard.

Checkmate? HAHAHAHAHAAH. You haven't once responded to what I actually said.......here, I'm going to use big words.

THE PERSON WHO SHOULD THINK BILL HAMBLIN IS AN ANTI-SEMITE DOES NOT. WHY DO YOU SAY HE IS?

Merry Christmas Scratchie (i.e. the new McCarthy of Anti-Semitism).
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

beastie wrote:I want to remind you, Ray, that I became The Enemy to you when I publicly opposed your (now incredibly hypocritical) assertion that the volatile sentiments expressed on the internet by "angry exmormons" would result in some quasi-mormon-holocaust - and up to that time, you and I had been quite friendly and had sided together on most topics. Yet I still opposed you when you said something I deemed patently ridiculous.


Don't think it ridiculous, yet.

beastie wrote:I'm on the same side as SLCabbie (the one you now applaud for saying I'm the product of incest for refusing to accept his assertions about Joseph Smith' narcissism), and Steve Benson, and have stood up to both of them.


You stood up to Steve Benson? Where? How many posts did you do ON RFM! criticising Benson?

beastie wrote:And if merc ever said anything remotely like "YOUR F***ING MISSIONARIES ARE DEAD" and I was around to read it, I'd stand up to him, too.


Let me remind you that this was a private email, NOT a public statement. It was uncovered by Gad because he's a committed anti-Mormon (just like you), and if Scratch or any ex-Mormon had written similarly, Gad would never bring this to public attention. Gad is not even remotely interested in whether Scratch lied, and would never condemn him for it anyway!
And you continue to IGNORE threats made PUBLICLY by angry apostates.

beastie wrote:Your defenses are pathetic, and Dan's truly apparent hypocrisy and double standard are equally pathetic.


You and Scratch should have dinner sometime.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Don't think it ridiculous, yet.


Well, I will say if many exmormons are of the same bent as YOU, it may just be possible.

But I will also say that YOU'RE the only exmormon I've ever met who expressed anything like YOUR F***ING MISSIONARIES ARE DEAD.

You stood up to Steve Benson? Where? How many posts did you do ON RFM! criticising Benson?


What convenient memory lapse you're developing.



Let me remind you that this was a private email, NOT a public statement. It was uncovered by Gad because he's a committed anti-Mormon (just like you), and if Scratch or any ex-Mormon had written similarly, Gad would never bring this to public attention. Gad is not even remotely interested in whether Scratch lied, and would never condemn him for it anyway!
And you continue to IGNORE threats made PUBLICLY by angry apostates.


Oh, it was a private PM, sent to the Z mods.

Well, that makes it A-OK!!!

So where are all these public threats made by angry apostates that I'm ignoring?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

The Nehor wrote:It is an accusation I can't prove. However will you deny that you routinely use Bill 'Anti-Semite' Hamblin and other terms regularly? I came up with 4 instances of this or things like it and I didn't even look hard.


You did? Where, other than this thread?

Checkmate? HAHAHAHAHAAH. You haven't once responded to what I actually said.......here, I'm going to use big words.

THE PERSON WHO SHOULD THINK BILL HAMBLIN IS AN ANTI-SEMITE DOES NOT. WHY DO YOU SAY HE IS?


Look, Nehor, I wasn't going to bring this up, but I, too, passed this along to some Jewish friends. Every single one of them found Hamblin's diatribe to be both over-the-top, and grossly offensive. Perhaps your lone friend is an anomaly, eh? Further, why do I need to be Jewish in order to find Hamblin's harangue offensive? It seems to me that I can (and should) be appalled by this sort of behavior regardless of creed.

In any case: check and mate. I win again.

Merry Christmas Scratchie (I.e. the new McCarthy of Anti-Semitism).


Same to you, Bro.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Ray A wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:You know, I just have to say: Wow. Ray truly is a complete and utter whack-job, and it really should come as no surprise to him that his credibility is in shambles. His flip-flopping, his volatile temper---they all add up to a very disturbing instability. Does he realize that he was the very "dork" who spoke those words? Did his "verbal hatred" turn to "physical violence"? Hmmm....


How can you talk about "credibility" when you lied, denied you lied for days, then admitted you lied? That admission went a long way to redeeming you a little. But you would not have admitted it unless I kept bringing the subject up. To this day you would have denied it.


Huh? Where did I "admit" that I lied? Or is this another one of your standard-issue misreadings?
Post Reply