Spirituality or just emotion...?

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_sheryl
_Emeritus
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:31 am

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _sheryl »

harmony wrote:
Another relative of Nightlion's, I see.

Welcome.


I do not know who or what Nightlion is. But this comment is very sad - concluding that all knowing of our Adonai is contained within an association with 'Nightlion'.

I pray that all come to know our Lord and Savior. On our own without having to be a 'relative of Nightlion's'.

Shabbat Shalom.
Peace be within all.

Sheryl
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _harmony »

sheryl wrote:
harmony wrote:
Another relative of Nightlion's, I see.

Welcome.


I do not know who or what Nightlion is. But this comment is very sad - concluding that all knowing of our Adonai is contained within an association with 'Nightlion'.

I pray that all come to know our Lord and Savior. On our own without having to be a 'relative of Nightlion's'.

Shabbat Shalom.
Peace be within all.

Sheryl


you might want to check out Nightlion. My comment was not an insult.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Corpsegrinder
_Emeritus
Posts: 615
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:33 pm

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _Corpsegrinder »

sheryl wrote:I do not know who or what Nightlion is. But this comment is very sad - concluding that all knowing of our Adonai is contained within an association with 'Nightlion'.

I pray that all come to know our Lord and Savior. On our own without having to be a 'relative of Nightlion's'.

Shabbat Shalom.
Peace be within all.

Sheryl

On the contrary, Harmony was paying you a compliment. Nightlion is a Latter-day prophet with a message every bit as compelling as that of Brother Joseph.

I, for one, am curious to hear what someone as in tune with the spirit as you has to say about Nightlion's revelations and exhortations. The same goes for jo1952.
_sheryl
_Emeritus
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:31 am

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _sheryl »

jo1952 wrote:Hi Sheryl!

For clarification, Satan is an archangel; does this help explain why he has so much power here on the earth?


Shabbat Shalom Jo!

A greater understanding of the ‘subjects’ in scripture can be had if we look to the divine principle behind the subject, the archetype, which then gives us a whole new layer of understanding of scripture!

For example, Israel is not simply the people that made up this nation, but representing a divine principal, an archetype of called out ones, or those who have struggled with God and prevailed – which is the actually meaning of the Hebrew word Israel. Thus Jacob was Israel and so was this nation made up of his descendents. And so are all called out ones, chosen for God's purposes. When we study Judaism at a deeper or mystical level, we discover that there is a whole level of teachings, revealing that the souls who incarnated as characters enacting or unveiling the history of Abraham’s descendents came into flesh just for that purpose, to play out the divine principles in the physical that would lead to the incarnation of the divine principal, or archetype, Messiah.

And so what is known as Satan is a divine principle – energies and beings that do not work in harmony with God’s Will but instead create struggle and tension - that yes is played out at all levels including the level of Archangel (there are Satanic emanations of all Archangels which is called the dark side of the Tree of Life). Now we teach that Satan is a 'secret force or mission of God’, meant to bring tension and struggle into creation. For without evil how could we long and desire for the good with enough energy to work to invoke it?

This becomes evident in Jesus calling his disciples ‘Satan’ at times, when they were manifesting disharmony with God’s Plan, and in ‘Satan’ being among the beni elohim or sons of God in the beginning of Job.

What I believe is that scripture, for the most part, is written in a language at its most simplest. It is truth which its authors have been inspired to write - and most prophets did so in a manner meant to be understood at a simpler level until an individual gains spiritual insight and is able to begin to see the multitudes of layers to be understood. Thus God obliges us with what we can understand - doing so at an easier and more plain way for us to relate to. If we continue to seek after God, He will continue to oblige. If we do not seek after Him, He still obliges us; and we are then not able to comprehend scripture at all. As you have said in so many words, it is up to us.


Indeed, dear sister. It is taught in many traditions that the Old Testament prophets were limited in their spiritual maturity, or vision, and are hence for the most part called lesser prophets. The greatest prophetic visions of the Bible being the visions of Daniel and of Apostle John in Revelation. God can only reveal what we are able to receive at the time. Jesus did though ground a revelation of God which most were and continue to be unable to receive. Thus it is only the few, as he declared, who are able to find the path and enter into the Kingdom.

Very interesting; and it makes sense up to the point where I still make the distinction that Jesus is literally and spiritually the Son of God within the definition as is understood wherein they are completely separate Beings.


I do not disagree at all, if you mean by literally, physically, and spiritually, extending out into the spiritual realms! A point of difference might be what we consider the Son of God to be. I know that Mormon understanding of Son of God is in some ways a bit more like mine, in that there is nothing that Jesus did not manifest that we too will not manifest. However, I do not limit the Son of God to the 3rd Heaven, but see him as Paul did, that in and through and by all that is is. As Paul says, I say that Christ is in all, and is all, and that all is in Christ. So whatever our understanding of the Son of God, if we are in accordance with Paul, it would have to be something that can contain all things and be contained by all things, yes?

And so instead of visualizing the Son of God as a being with a beginning and an end that stands in the third heaven, I see him as the third heaven, and all heavens, so that the Son of God not only dwells in all dwelling places but is all dwelling places.

I thus also see this both literally and spiritually, so that while the soul or consciousness that incarnated into our world was Jesus, it was simultaneously the world, the soul or Christ coming into itself to save parts of itself. (this is a hint that I was pointing to in my admonishment to Frank) John 1.

I do see the difference. However, as I just said, what this ultimately looks like to me is that Jesus has emanated from the Father as an individual, spiritual Being. As such, and inasmuch as His desire was to completely do only the will of Father, Father gave Jesus the power and authority to then accomplish what He has in the manner you have described.


Paul gives a whole dialog on Spirit begetting Spirit, not flesh - that only flesh can beget flesh, in an attempt to bring some clarity into what this ultimately looks like. Since Jesus is the begotten of the Father, everything that the Father is Jesus is also. Meaning that if the Father is realms and realms of potential and actualization so is Jesus. An infinite being will not beget a finite being. And so the finite being that was the man Jesus was begotten by Mary and Joseph, placed within that though was a finger, a touchdown of an infinite being begotten by the infinite Father, as though God reached from the infinite and touched down in time and space. Indeed a miracle, one that requires a meeting of flesh and Spirit in a way never before occurring in this world.

I know that you have trouble believing that Joseph Smith was a prophet. As you know, I do believe he is a prophet. I also believe that the Book of Mormon is indeed an authentic second Testimony of Christ which was written by the peoples God led to the Americas; and that the Book of Mormon is a partial translation of their records which God inspired Joseph to bring forth. Now, in responding to your response of not knowing what Joseph saw, I believe that it is quite possible that when Joseph began receiving visions, that he did not understand them either. Just like us, as we progress in our understanding, he did likewise; though he had the advantage of being taught and administered to in his teachings by Angels of the Lord. In fact, when we look back at our own experiences with the Holy Ghost, we will perceive them differently today because our understanding has been added upon; thus we will expound on our experiences when we relate them today. It is also likely, as with many of the other teachings taught in the New Testament, that he learned more than he was allowed to reveal. As such the innate use of the words/language he used were done in the same manner as all previous scripture (in particular, the Bible) was revealed to mankind.


As I have shared, I believe that there is good work occurring in this world through the purification and healing work of the members of the LDS Church, and so whatever Joseph Smith experienced, it is being used for good. My understanding of who and what Joseph Smith was and experienced comes from my own experiencing, in having similar visions as he described, and in experiencing the Light Presence and Power of true Apostles. It is not a difficulty to believe, it just is. It is a knowing. This is what I know. This is what I know of Joseph Smith.

I would offer to anyone having visions or visitations by angels, do not take them at their face value, but seek purification and guidance. In other words, anytime a being tells you that you are something or that you have to do something, always look for confirmation in the physical, meaning that if God has chosen you, he will send you to or send to you one who was chosen before, to initiation you and to guide you into right understanding. In this way one stays connected to the remnant and will not be led astray by lesser spiritual entities.

You made me smile, as we can all picture individuals carrying signs on corners warning us that the end is near; and they are very sincere in their belief. I believe that as individuals, when we have experienced the Holy Ghost, we do react in humility. I would offer though, that the ancient Apostles could not keep the Good News to themselves, and went forth sharing what they knew. Likewise, Moses, who had a very distinctive responsibility, was not silently waiting; but went forth and did what God commanded him to do. Anyway, as I further study the works and writings and teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, I continue to receive the witness of the Holy Ghost confirming his calling and accomplishments. I believe that he was instructed to grow a new church in order to teach the Gospel correctly, etc., because that meets the way or method mankind identifies with in the flesh. Unfortunately, man also gives way too much weight to an institution, as it is their personal relationship with God which progresses them.


Indeed the desire to give and the desire to receive are ingrained in us, thus it is through human desire that God works in this world. Our desire to receive though must be purified from ‘Satan’ or that which seeks to work in disharmony - desire for self alone, hence we will be led to the wilderness when we have received, to first be purified, before we become engaged in sacred receiving and giving, all for the Kingdom of Heaven!

I do not agree, however, with the interpretations of most members who think that the LDS Church is the only "way" or "path". No church institution can save a single person. Nonetheless, I do believe that the ordinances being currently performed by the Church are necessary; but they are merely the mechanical method of an individual to be able to enter a promise/contract with God. In other words, the LDS Church is a vehicle. Once the Millenium is ended, I believe the LDS Church will be dissolved, as will any other vehicles (religious institutions or other world "religions").


There is a necessity for a connection with others in our journey, as mentioned above, because this world is very dark and hostile, as are the lower heavens, and so we must remain connected with true community, no matter what level we are at. If our community does not feel right, though, we need to leave, to exit, because the Holy Spirit is calling us, preparing us, for greater community, for more purity, more sacred receiving and giving.

Also, I believe that since it is belief in and acceptance of Christ (which can take place in our physical body, or after mortal death), that salvation is much more easily attained than most think. However, our spiritual journey is eternal. It began before we got here, continues while we are in the flesh, and will continue after we leave the earth. Whatever spiritual understanding we obtain in the flesh is "bonus" understanding, which allows us to be that much more joyful with whatever else we have revealed to us while we are here. Thus, the quest for Exaltation will continue wherever we are until we have achieved it; even then we will continue in the eternities. Once we reach true spiritual awakening, we thirst for more and more...and if this is happening in the flesh, our quest can lead us to unexpected sources only because we were previously blind to them; yet happily we seek as our joy increases unbounded except by our own self-inflicted limitations.


Indeed, we are to follow our thirst, allowing God to purify it so that we might hunger and thirst for righteousness ( which is God’s Giving).

Sheryl, you ALWAYS help!!! I love you!!

Shalom,,

jo


May all beings hunger and thirst for the Kingdom of Heaven and its righteousness! Amen.

Sheryl
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _just me »

It's like a big ol' testimony lovefest up in here...in Hebrew. Adds new flavor to the board.
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _Morley »

just me wrote:It's like a big ol' testimony lovefest up in here...in Hebrew. Adds new flavor to the board.


Yeah. Some of that good, old 'Christian Hebrew.'
_sheryl
_Emeritus
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:31 am

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _sheryl »

Corpsegrinder wrote:On the contrary, Harmony was paying you a compliment. Nightlion is a Latter-day prophet with a message every bit as compelling as that of Brother Joseph.

I, for one, am curious to hear what someone as in tune with the spirit as you has to say about Nightlion's revelations and exhortations. The same goes for jo1952.



Shalom Corpsegrinder!

Thank you for the clarification. My apologies, though the sadness still remains, that so few know their Adonai.

In taking a quick look, I found a short discussion on his website, I believe, about Zion and the Church and the Zion of Jesus Christ, and in his words there is some truth being expressed - that we are called to an obedience greater than what the masses can imagine. As Jesus said, the path is difficult and the gate is narrow and few will find it.

What I felt was missing though was compassion. In other words, he feels to be touching into the mind of Christ, but without knowing the Heart of Christ. I may be mistaken, but this is the energy felt in the words of this article. Our obedience cannot be separate from the Heart of Christ, meaning it is because of compassion, seeking to do for others, seeking to receive from God so that we might give to others, that is the path. A path of being obedient in seeking for oneself - seeking eternal life for oneself alone - is a false path, is without the compassion of Christ, though it might be one of a greater understanding than had by the masses.

Curious the Hebrew and Greek words translated as righteousness mean Giving, thus God's Giving is perfect, seeks nothing in return - giving fully to us as we are able to receive. If we emulate the Father, or emulate the Son who is the image of the Father in creation, we give without expectation.

Walking in obedience is what purifies us so that we are able to receive in greater abundance, able thus to give in greater abundance.

A servant, or prophet of God, emulates this, giving fully to those able to receive, asking for nothing for self, in full faith that all that will be needed will be provided by God. A prophet of God walks the path of self purification, purifying their desires to receive so that they might receive to give. Even to their enemies.

Edited to add: I am attempting to read more online more about Nightlion and his vision and understanding. There appears to be some broken links, a transition from one website to another, perhaps? But will post again after doing more reading.

Shabbat Shalom!

Sheryl
Last edited by Guest on Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.
_jo1952
_Emeritus
Posts: 1118
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:04 am

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _jo1952 »

just me wrote:It's like a big ol' testimony lovefest up in here...in Hebrew. Adds new flavor to the board.


Hi Just Me!

It is a true rejoicing and edification! It helps to feed my thirst and hunger in seeking more and more Truth. Something which the Holy Ghost will never stop revealing when we are still seeking. As soon as Father deems we are ready for more, the Holy Ghost reveals it to us.

Love,

jo
_UnicornMan
_Emeritus
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 7:09 am

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _UnicornMan »

I am happy to be at odds with a member of the First Presidency, or any prophet when my life experiences points me in a different direction, or to reach a different conclusion. Often, their statements line up or even direct my thinking -- but never always.

As Dallin H. Oaks said, all they can teach is general principles. If you think you have an exception you have to work it out between you and the Lord.

The old argument that "A GA said it so you can't disagree" holds no water with me anymore.

If I was in a more contrarion mood, I'd start a thread where we list every objectionable thing we've heard over the pulpit. Not necessarily false, not necessarily true, just opinion -- which may or may not be inspired.

One's own personal filter and personal clock need to be the ultimate ruler in that case. And it CAN conflict with the priesthood line when the priesthood line is making uncategorical statements that can't possibly apply to everyone.
_Corpsegrinder
_Emeritus
Posts: 615
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:33 pm

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _Corpsegrinder »

sheryl said:
What I felt was missing though was compassion. In other words, he feels to be touching into the mind of Christ, but without knowing the Heart of Christ. I may be mistaken, but this is the energy felt in his words. Our obedience cannot be separate from the Heart of Christ, meaning it is because of compassion, seeking to do for others, seeking to receive from God so that we might give to others, that is the path. A path of being obedient of seeking for oneself is a false path, though it might be one of a greater understanding than had by the masses.

This seems like a pretty heavy condemnation to lay on somebody you’ve neither met nor spoken to in real life. Is this what the Spirit prompted you to say?

I just saw another sign that indicated this path of receiving for self alone, in that I could not find an access to what Nightlion received without paying a fee.

If I remember my Church history correctly, the first edition of the Book of Mormon was sold for three bucks a copy, which in today’s money is much more expensive than what Nightlion wants. I would also add that full membership in the Church is anything but free, what with tithing, fast offrings, & etc.

Maybe you need to cut the guy some slack.
Post Reply