Chomsky wrote:Honestly, I (obviously) have no idea concerning his motive for joining the church.
I don't think one should necessarily discount the possibility that it was because of a perceived divine revelation that the Church is true. Being smart and educated doesn't necessarily mean that one wouldn't join a religion unless there was a romantic interest involved (even if that religion has a lot of difficulties in its origins).
But who knows.
I don't have any more information about his introduction to the church than you do. I am not assigning a motive so much as stating what the circumstances were.
After many many years of observing the existing church community and contrasting this community against new converts, I have come to a pretty solid conclusion that we only share the gospel downhill. This means we do not convert or even attempt to convert our social, economic, or educational peers. We do not proselyte to our neighbors, our coworkers, other parents our children attend school with or play soccer with.
Those who we will share the gospel with must be a couple of rungs or more beneath us on the social ladder. An individual without an education, solid income, or a strong social network, lacks the measure of success that would be necessary to intimidate a church member. When a member shares the gospel in this fashion, they have all the leverage. This scenario is similar in ways to an authority figure addressing a young person. It is all about the perception of power. If a member invites an individual to church, who is clearly beneath their own socio-economic standing, the member has wagered nothing. If this members invitation gets declined, there is no loss, simply because the member had nothing on the table so to speak.
Back to Mak...My impression of him is that he is not socially wanting. He also is an intelligent guy, educated. Bottom line is we don't convert guys like Mak. Maklelan could not go out and convert his equal.....no he could not! But a girl could
