Epic Mormonism Live on Rosebud Accusations

[Kishkumen]

Hey man, I'm just trying to keep track of what the rules are here. Is this a board where baseless accusations are thrown around with no evidence or is it not? You have been the one banging that drum endlessly. It's just very curious what happens when you are held to your own standard.

Yeah, baseless accusations ARE thrown around here without evidence. Rosebud did this for many years before you tried to prove you would be her ideal boyfriend by white-knighting her here without talking to her about it. Then you arrived to carry her water and play empty rhetorical games while shotgun blasting all kinds of accusations about John, including not only sexual harassment, but also, LOL!, tax fraud!

Dude, you are so transparently a wing nut that I have to grab my sides to keep from splitting wide open.

[drumdude]

Is this still about Rosebud...?

[jpatterson]

Is this still about Rosebud...?

Yeah, I'm still trying to understand where this assumption that she's been conspiring with KK and Kwaku comes from. That part is news to me.

I would love to know if it's anything more than Kishkumen's frantic fever dreams (don't forget this is the same guy who thinks I'm in bed with LDS Inc) but somehow I doubt that's the case.

[Kishkumen]

"And when you have run out of bad arguments you turn to ad hominem. You would make a fine Mopologist."

LOL. You're the gift that truly keeps on giving.

Hey, you are the one who is here shilling for Rosebud without talking to her! If you keep spilling out little gems like that, they will find their way into the conversation. So which is it? Are you in communication with her or are you not? And if not, why are you here? Because you hate JD’s hypocrisy as you said? That’s it, right? You said you couldn’t stand hypocrisy, so it looks like you are happy to use Rosebud’s accusations for your own purpose, which is to hound JD because you are so obsessed about his hypocrisy.

All we can do is draw inferences from the evidence you have given us.

1. Hates John’s hypocrisy.

2. Is not in communication with Rosebud.

Tell me which of those is wrong, and I’ll happily adjust my hypothesis!

[Kishkumen]

Yeah, I'm still trying to understand where this assumption that she's been conspiring with KK and Kwaku comes from. That part is news to me.

I would love to know if it's anything more than Kishkumen's frantic fever dreams (don't forget this is the same guy who thinks I'm in bed with LDS Inc) but somehow I doubt that's the case.

You’re a regular Q here, JP. And here I thought I missed out by not following Donald Trump’s tweets!

[jpatterson]

You're awfully demanding for someone who can't even produce evidence for a simple argument after spending 200 pages whining about people providing evidence for their arguments.

[Kishkumen]

Is this still about Rosebud...?

I am not sure that JP is not in need of some kind of intervention here, drumdude. He has confessed that for all this time he did not communicate with Rosebud, and on top of that he had no idea that Kate Kelly shared Rosebud’s accusations on Kwaku’s show! I think we are looking at his cry for help. I don’t know whether JP is in love with Rosebud or John Dehlin.

[Kishkumen]

You're awfully demanding for someone who can't even produce evidence for a simple argument after spending 200 pages whining about people providing evidence for their arguments.

You made the claims, JP. You wimped out. You have nothing for us. No evidence. Nothing to communicate from Rosebud (naturally because you haven’t been in communication with her). You’re just here for attention and to continue to live out the drama of being connected to Rosebud and John Dehlin in some way. It’s all quite sad.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Rosebud herself states she hasn’t been paying any attention to anything posted anywhere. She’s put this whole affair behind her. That’s from her Facebook. So, read into that what you will given the last few pages.

- Doc

[jpatterson]

You made the claims, JP. You wimped out. You have nothing for us. No evidence.

I exposed NHP's faulty memory/lies in her ML interview on the very first page of this thread, which is backed up by evidence and now accepted as fact (as much as consig wants to ignore it).

Others asked for proof of the sexual nature of their relationship. That evidence is now obvious. People asked for proof of Joanna Brooks' poor handling of the situation (I believe it was you who claimed there's no way Joanna would have fumbled anything of this nature). It's now accepted that Joanna and the board handled things poorly.

You, on the other hand, have spent almost 200 pages moving goal posts and now you're the one making accusations and not offering up any evidence to back them up.

So I ask you again, why is it unacceptable for me to come here and offer up accusations with no evidence, but it's perfectly fine for you to do so?