What a massive amount of piss washing of what canpakes said. You turn all pro-labor in your response which yet again suggests self-loathing is at work. Otherwise, you'd be a socialist and for something rather than chosing the negative identity option instead.Cultellus wrote: ↑Sun Nov 07, 2021 9:32 pmSo, if people work toward parity, if they work for application of fair wages, if they sacrifice time and money to work toward equality for themselves and their co-workers or employees - and do not succeed - are they terrorists and anti-establishment rioters?canpakes wrote: ↑Sun Nov 07, 2021 9:25 pm
This is a practical analysis. It’s like the example of a claimed populist aim given upstream of ‘wage and wealth parity’. Yet, the lack of doing the hard work to define how to achieve the desired parity (or even defining what that means) reveals that this populist aim is just a masking of anger against what the populist perceives others have, and/or how s/he is disadvantaged.
Past the rage and grievance, then what?
Nobody owes you the hard work to define something, you lazy POS. Your petulant "reveal" here is about you, not anybody else.
Arguments like yours are important too, panny. People need to know that you have given up hope for people that do not align with the elitists. You think that if they can be smashed now, they could and should be smashed forever. I hope you tell everyone you think that. I disagree. I will be back on the picket lines if I am asked, and I will advocate for fair wages and benefits.
Extremism. What a waste.