Some Schmo wrote:Nobody's ever tried to kill me because I'm not stupid enough to put myself in that situation.
If a woman is stupid enough to put herself in the situation of being in a dark alley, is it her fault if she is raped?
Just so I'm clear, are you trying to say that a dumb teenager walking down a crowded street pointing an assault rifle at people is the same as a woman walking into a dark alley?
Holy damned “F” balls, Shades. What the “F” is wrong with you?
Religion is for people whose existential fear is greater than their common sense.
Well, the problem of open wearing of a miniskirt in questionable situations has been resolved to everyone's satisfaction. I think polite society has unanimously agreed that if a convicted felon with a long criminal record--or anyone else, for that matter--tries to rape a woman who wears a miniskirt in a questionable situation, then she is justified in using a firearm against him to defend herself, regardless of why she put herself in that situation, and regardless of what she is holding/carrying/wearing, etc. I don't see how this is any different.
I can't damned believe you think this analogous.
A woman wearing a mini skirt is putting herself in a rape situation, is she? I mean, she's just asking to be assaulted... is that it?
I'm at a loss for words.
Religion is for people whose existential fear is greater than their common sense.
A democratic society not only allows for, but required, peaceful protest and activism to motivate change.
A civil society is one where the citizenry outsource the enforcing of law to trained individuals who take on that responsibility - and it's a responsibility with all that entails.
When civil, democratic society begins to fray the individual breakdown of both of the above are not in anyone's best long term interest if one values living in a civil society.
The law as it currently exists isn't well equipped to address this fraying. And whatever the result may be, overreaction is most likely to result in problematic legislation. Likely we'll see bad laws from states come out of this that reflect bad reactions from both sides.
Well, the problem of open wearing of a miniskirt in questionable situations has been resolved to everyone's satisfaction. I think polite society has unanimously agreed that if a convicted felon with a long criminal record--or anyone else, for that matter--tries to rape a woman who wears a miniskirt in a questionable situation, then she is justified in using a firearm against him to defend herself, regardless of why she put herself in that situation, and regardless of what she is holding/carrying/wearing, etc. I don't see how this is any different.
I can't damned believe you think this analogous.
A woman wearing a mini skirt is putting herself in a rape situation, is she? I mean, she's just asking to be assaulted... is that it?
I'm at a loss for words.
Did Shades really say this? That's unbelievable. Wow. I didn't see it in the last couple of pages but if so, Shades you have some serious thinking to do.
You’ve got to keep up. The sequence with Huber has already been discussed and doesn’t match your claim anyway. And I’ve addressed Shades’s questions and his follow up.
And Rittenhouse was literally sitting on his ass, righted up, when he took aim at Jumpkick man, who hadn’t hit the air yet. It’s all there in video.
You've gotta be kiddin me!! The statement above is why you and K Graham come across as beta males. Let me explain it to you one more time. In the brain of a beta male, it's perfectly fine for a bunch of crazed progressives to go out and riot, burn and loot. Not only that, the beta male brain thinks the rioters shouldn't face any kind of resistance because of, you know, SOCIAL JUSTICE and all that cool crap! The Beta male brain is perfectly fine with burning 100s of cars, burning businesses, dumpsters and so on. In fact, the beta male FEELS like it's his RIGHT to destroy personal property and prove a point to everyone who disagrees with him and his SOCIAL JUSTICE CRUSADE!!! So when someone like Kyle Rittenhouse comes along and offers a differing opinion like, STOP BURNING PEOPLES crap, the beta brain can't handle the differing opinion. You see, the beta brain isn't equipped to process more than one opinion. Only their opinion matters, Only their opinion can SAVE us from ourselves!
Kyle Rittenhouse killed a two beta males looking for trouble and shot another guy who pointed a gun at him. Their beta brains probably convinced them that they were invincible and could do whatever they wanted to without consequence. They died because they chased a guy with an AR15 who was retreating and trying not to shoot them. If you guys can't understand that you're a bunch of dumb fother muckers. Again, for all the beta males reading this!!! Don't chase a guy that is carrying an AR15. Drop kicks and skate boards only work as weapons in video games. !!CAUTION!! BETA MALES! When burning and destroying personal property, don't chase the AR15 guy.
The statement above is why you and K Graham come across as beta males
In contrast to K-G, would you say that K-R is a good example of an alpha male?
Social distancing has likely already begun to flatten the curve...Continue to research good antivirals and vaccine candidates. Make everyone wear masks. -- J.D. Vance
Not to mention him practically having an orgasm the day before about the thought of shooting a shoplifter with his AR15... Death for shoplifting...
How do you know it was him in the video?
At best this is state sanctioned preplanned vigilante justice. Not much different from a mob of protesters (the protesters, or rioters, or whatever) didn't kill anyone. Not saying that riots are the way to go, but they feel like it's the only recourse when people are downtrodden.
Their feelings don't allow them to break the law.
At the worst he showed an interest in hunting "criminals" and got away with it.
If so, I'd say that running away from one's quarry is a very novel way of "hunting" it.
He is also a coward.
So, everyone here is wrong? Instead of running away, he should've stood his ground and shot?
The video evidence is actually pretty damning. He ran away and tripped on his way out and shot two people that were clearly trying to stop an active shooter
I find it interesting that a person who is running away and NOT shooting can be considered an "active shooter."
1. Are you saying it was a deep fake or something?
2. Try reading what I wrote again and think about it for a minute.
3. Really? He ran into the situation with a gun and probably pissed his pants when he found his "criminal" hunting fantasy wasn't all it was cracked up to be
4. He is a coward, hence the AR15. Not to mention the running away after he got what he came for.
5. He shot a person. He was an active shooter at that point.
You’ve got to keep up. The sequence with Huber has already been discussed and doesn’t match your claim anyway. And I’ve addressed Shades’s questions and his follow up.
And Rittenhouse was literally sitting on his ass, righted up, when he took aim at Jumpkick man, who hadn’t hit the air yet. It’s all there in video.
You’ve got to keep up. The sequence with Huber has already been discussed and doesn’t match your claim anyway. And I’ve addressed Shades’s questions and his follow up.
And Rittenhouse was literally sitting on his ass, righted up, when he took aim at Jumpkick man, who hadn’t hit the air yet. It’s all there in video.
You've gotta be kiddin me!! The statement above is why you and K Graham come across as beta males. Let me explain it to you one more time. In the brain of a beta male, it's perfectly fine for a bunch of crazed progressives to go out and riot, burn and loot. Not only that, the beta male brain thinks the rioters shouldn't face any kind of resistance because of, you know, SOCIAL JUSTICE and all that cool crap! The Beta male brain is perfectly fine with burning 100s of cars, burning businesses, dumpsters and so on. In fact, the beta male FEELS like it's his RIGHT to destroy personal property and prove a point to everyone who disagrees with him and his SOCIAL JUSTICE CRUSADE!!! So when someone like Kyle Rittenhouse comes along and offers a differing opinion like, STOP BURNING PEOPLES crap, the beta brain can't handle the differing opinion. You see, the beta brain isn't equipped to process more than one opinion. Only their opinion matters, Only their opinion can SAVE us from ourselves!
Kyle Rittenhouse killed a two beta males looking for trouble and shot another guy who pointed a gun at him. Their beta brains probably convinced them that they were invincible and could do whatever they wanted to without consequence. They died because they chased a guy with an AR15 who was retreating and trying not to shoot them. If you guys can't understand that you're a bunch of dumb fother muckers. Again, for all the beta males reading this!!! Don't chase a guy that is carrying an AR15. Drop kicks and skate boards only work as weapons in video games. !!CAUTION!! BETA MALES! When burning and destroying personal property, don't chase the AR15 guy.
Lol, OK. I’ll pass along your rant to the next person that tries to stop a school shooter. I’m sure that they’ll be concerned that the anonymous ALLCAPS fellow on the Internet needs to call them a beta male for it. ; )
and destroying personal property, don't chase the AR15 guy.
