NBC news story on Hunter Biden

[canpakes]

Paul Manafort is probably corrupt…okay throw him is jail.

Not ‘probably’ … is. : D

By the rules of your own logic, that means that Trump is eyeballs deep in corruption. We should spend lots of money investigating him for his corruption. Because Manafort.

[honorentheos]

...did Eric S have power of attorney of Joes account or not? LOL I will wait for that answer.

You act as if something has been proven to be deep corruption exposed, or, at least heaving just beneath the surface waiting to be exposed.

Nothing that you seem concerned about means anything. Except you've been told that the emails from 2010 prove something meaningful. They yank your chain, you bark.

[canpakes]

Do you have any idea what we are discussing?

Markk, you can’t ask that question of others until you meet that same threshold yourself.

[Markk]

No I didn’t, I presented a fact that a investment firm ran and owned by lobbyists, owned by the VP’s son, was paying the VP’s bills. It has nothing to do with what bills were paid, but that bills were being paid…your straw man feel before it was written.

It’s not a straw man to ask you to show good evidence of what you’re claiming, or to ask you to explain why you believe it’s illegal. ; )

Your argument about a simple phone bill is a straw man. Honor conceded is that Joe’s bills were being paid by a lobbyist who has power of attorney over Joes accounts as early as 2010, and out of hind-site a firm that was having money sent to them by a Russian backed oligarch. In fact it is on record that MZ/Burisma sent over 100k to Rosemond, a day before Archer went to the White House, and before Hunter and archer were hired to sit on that board of directors… So yes it is a straw-man fallacy.

You can now stand down Jersey Girl is going to take your argument over. I am sure she is well versed in all this.

[Markk]

Do you have any idea what we are discussing?

Markk, you can’t ask that question of others until you meet that same threshold yourself.

I think I am doing oaky…lets let Jersey Girl take over..this will be interesting.

[Markk]

...did Eric S have power of attorney of Joes account or not? LOL I will wait for that answer.

You act as if something has been proven to be deep corruption exposed, or, at least heaving just beneath the surface waiting to be exposed.

Nothing that you seem concerned about means anything. Except you've been told that the emails from 2010 prove something meaningful. They yank your chain, you bark.

No, just another item on the time line that you demanded…Eric S, a lobbyist, had power of attorney of monies of a sitting VP. At this pint, nothing more and nothing less…quoting Yul Brynner..”let it be written, let it be done”

We can move on.

[Jersey Girl]

Still following. Markk will you please define 'strawman' as you are using it here? Thanks.

NO…I tell you what..instead of just being a nanny, actually take th e lead in the conversation. Honor and pakes can stand down, and you can take over? Fair.Do you have any idea what we are discussing?

Nanny? I asked you a simple question! What on earth explains your reaction?

[honorentheos]

You act as if something has been proven to be deep corruption exposed, or, at least heaving just beneath the surface waiting to be exposed.

Nothing that you seem concerned about means anything. Except you've been told that the emails from 2010 prove something meaningful. They yank your chain, you bark.

No, just another item on the time line that you demanded…Eric S, a lobbyist, had power of attorney of monies of a sitting VP. At this pint, nothing more and nothing less…quoting Yul Brynner..”let it be written, let it be done”

We can move on.

The narrative being Hunter was paying for Joe in 2010 based on a text to his daughter years later said in a fight. Yeah, I think the above clearly shows we can move on.

[canpakes]

It’s not a straw man to ask you to show good evidence of what you’re claiming, or to ask you to explain why you believe it’s illegal. ; )

Your argument about a simple phone bill is a straw man.

I didn’t make an argument over a cellphone bill. You did, claiming that it meant … something. When I asked you to explain what, exactly, you retreated to claiming that my request is a ‘straw man’.

Honor conceded is that Joe’s bills were being paid by a lobbyist who has power of attorney over Joes accounts as early as 2010, and out of hind-site a firm that was having money sent to them by a Russian backed oligarch. In fact it is on record that MZ/Burisma sent over 100k to Rosemond, a day before Archer went to the White House, and before Hunter and archer were hired to sit on that board of directors… So yes it is a straw-man fallacy.

This particular chunk of your ‘case’ is indeed a bit screwed up, but I’m not sure that I’d call it a straw man. Just, ‘screwed up’.
: )

You can now stand down Jersey Girl is going to take your argument over. I am sure she is well versed in all this.

I’m good with that, for now. But, I might be back later to ask you to explain another of your random claims so that you can refuse to do so again.

[honorentheos]

Honor conceded is that Joe’s bills were being paid by a lobbyist who has power of attorney over Joes accounts as early as 2010, and out of hind-site a firm that was having money sent to them by a Russian backed oligarch.

Tainting almost all of the above in conspiracy is fiction fabricated from imagination. In 2010, a financial management firm paying bills out of the owners trust is meaningless. The firms dealings in 2014 aren't retroactive. You seem to believe magic money from 2015 is being used to pay Joe's bills in 2010. You believe in Lamanites is all this comes down to, really.