Any chance of a brief summary? From the Amazon blurb, it sounds as though the book is certainly trying to do something good.
I took a few English courses and one history seminar as undergrad electives, and found them really interesting and quite different from all my math and physics. I’ve always wanted there to be a clear case for thriving humanities departments at universities.
The “cross-training” arguments, about critical thinking and communication skills, have always seemed self-defeating, however. If the point of studying 17th-century poems, say, is to learn how to assess 21st-century business plans, then why not just study 21st-century business plans directly and cut out the middleman?
I‘ve been listening for better arguments, hoping to hear them, but I’m at a German technische Universität with no humanities departments, so I’m not going to hear them around me, and I’m not the right person to construct these arguments myself.
How well does Adler do?