Morley wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 6:01 pm
Markk wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 7:21 pm
Morley,
Is this the thread you were referring to in our current conversation?
Thanks
It is indeed.
So in reading through it quickly, looking only at your posts....
You wrote...
Though it's not really germane to the election, I couldn't help but see the debate from the viewpoint of the international community. The purported most powerful nation on Earth is in the throes of an election, and each major party is represented by an elderly man, neither of whom could coherently express a complete thought. At one point, they degenerated to trading unintelligible barbs about their respective golf games.
The problem was that Trump lived up to expectations, while Biden was clearly diminished. Trump preformed as predicted: He was a bombastic, prevaricating asswipe, who whined and deflected on the simplest of questions. But because the bar was set so low, all Trump had to do was to keep from taking a dump on stage. That Biden was unable to call him out on most of it, and that Biden came across as an elderly great-grandfather who was out of his depth, was devastating. He looked like a old man who was trying to keep focused on what was being said at Thanksgiving Dinner. It was a true Michael-Dukakis-perched-in-a-tank moment. Virtually any other Democratic politician would have done better.
The problem is--what happens next? The last time that there was a late switch in US presidential candidates was in 1968, when Lyndon Johnson stepped out of the running. That did not end well for Democrats. I still think Biden needs to bow out.
Are you asserting these groups, leading the protests against Israel are all free of anti-sigmatism's? Are you? You are quick to accuse Israel of all sorts of genocide, and then just casually say, yes Hamas is bad.
If these, and other groups are concerned about both Israel and Hamas, we should see a balanced "protest".....correct?
Gunnar: Be clear, though, that despite that, I am not claiming that the atrocities of October 7 are in any way excusable. It should never have happened, and the perpetrators still deserve the severest condemnation and punishment.
Then we will see threads here about your hatred for these terrorists that are a root cause of this conflict.
Tell me about the October 7th attack, and what occurred. In you opinion, what should have been Israel's response?
Gunnar: Of course they are (at least antisemitic towards one particular semitic group -- don't forget that Arabs are also semitic). But, nevertheless, despite that, neither that fact nor the history you think I have not considered, the fact still remains that protesting the genocide and war crimes perpetrated at the direction of the state of Israel is not antisemitic, no matter what you say or think!
We both understand what the term antisemitism means in context with the subject. Moving forward, keep that in mind.
If at a demonstration, if those demonstrators carry signs and chant "from the river to the sea," is that antisemitic.
Markk, if you are trying to link antisemitism into this thread - seemingly out of nowhere - it will be better if I move your redirection to the ‘Harvard’ thread.
(Moved to 159747 at 11:35 MST 06.07.25) -c-