Honor, I’ve tried very hard to distinguish between what Congress can do and what it legally can do.
Hi Res,
Again, thank you for the detailed reply. It seems to me that the 2004 example underlies that, whatever the language says it leaves the future murky even if it seems to point out what ought to happen. If Ohio met the safe harbor date for certification, and Congress acted then for purely political purposes despite there being some basis for arguing they were in the wrong for doing so, then it seems we will just have to see how it plays out come January 6.
Chatter in the conservative press implies there are plenty of GOP congresspersons seeking Senate members to partner up on objections. And while none have gone public in saying they will, there are plenty of GOP Senators with ambition for 2024 who could easily see this as a way to set that ball in motion while trying to win over Trump's supporters.
US politics...good times.
I think at this point I'm consigned to the objections happening (while hoping you end up being right) but after that? Phew.
CFR for any case that had affidavits reviewed by the judge and then judge dismissed same case with a "disregard" for those affidavits.
I can wait for your response, even though "people like you" usually avoid fact based responses.
And an article regarding the dismissal of the case directly above from a Georgia Fox affiliate so you don't hurt yourself bending over backwards trying to matrix-dodge based on source dismissal:
That's just a few examples, subbie. You can find them if you have genuine concern for the republic and want to know how well our institutions are protecting us from the attack on our system of government being waged by the outgoing the President. I'm sure that's your real concern so you should feel a bit of relief.
Um, kewl links...but my CFR was pretty clear.
Perhaps you can provide an actual case that "had affidavits reviewed by the judge and then judge dismissed same case with a "disregard" for those affidavits."?
Your links to random affidavits and a news report about a dismissal based upon standing does not support your assertion.
But given your 48 months of "Russia!", i get how you insist on believing something that just isn't there and that has no proof.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
Those links go to the cases and filings followed by the rulings. No news reports, no filtering. Just cases and results other than last link to the Fox News affiliate story on one of them.
Like I said, subbie. I don't think you get the difference between actual evidence and innuendo. For all the bitching about media people on the right put out, it seems y'all don't know how to do anything without it being chewed up and spit in your mouth by a conservative news source first.
Um, kewl links...but my CFR was pretty clear.
Perhaps you can provide an actual case that "had affidavits reviewed by the judge and then judge dismissed same case with a "disregard" for those affidavits."?
Here's what I said since it seems the pipes in your mind have crossed and the sewer is getting into the drinking water:
It's why folks like you imagine the existence of affidavits carries more weight than the actions of the courts that reviewed those affidavits and dismissed the cases they were attached to without much regard.
The dismissal and disregard is referencing the cases to which said affidavits are attached.
For all the bitching about media people on the right put out, it seems y'all don't know how to do anything without it being chewed up and spit in your mouth by a conservative news source first.
There's a zero chance he reads anything from those links. In fact, there's a zero chance he clicked on them. Remember, he just thumb scrolls on his phone, and types out some one-liners.
That said, thanks for posting them. There's a discussion happening in my neck of the woods about the election and I'll share the rulings you found.
The dismissal and disregard is referencing the cases to which said affidavits are attached.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
For all the bitching about media people on the right put out, it seems y'all don't know how to do anything without it being chewed up and spit in your mouth by a conservative news source first.
There's a zero chance he reads anything from those links. In fact, there's a zero chance he clicked on them. Remember, he just thumb scrolls on his phone, and types out some one-liners.
That said, thanks for posting them. There's a discussion happening in my neck of the woods about the election and I'll share the rulings you found.
- Doc
wow, you sure read all those links quick
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
I'm still reading them? You luxuriate in your ignorance and assume people are as daft as you are. Jesus Christ.
- Doc
Oh, so you are going to share them prior to that - roger that.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
