Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 10:07 pm
canpakes wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 7:37 pm
Aside from someone who had knocked his cap off, no one had done any of those things to Rittenhouse at the point of time where Rittenhouse ended up tripping, righted himself and aimed at folks around him.
Correct. He didn't shoot at them until AFTER they attacked him. Thus making it necessary for him to defend himself.
That’s an option, versus the one that I gave earlier.
What would have happened if he
didn’t shoot when he did?
You’re convinced that he would have been killed, yet Groskreutz had a firearm, was right at Rittenhouse, and didn’t fire.
And you maintain that if person A aims at person B, then it’s not the same thing as person B aiming person A.
If you were an officer running after a felon, and he fell, and then aimed and fired at you, are you allowed to take defensive steps? Would you try to use your feet in motion to assist? At the point in time that this happened between Jump Kick Man and Rittenhouse, Rittenhouse had shot someone, and Jump Kick Man was only running after Rittenhouse.
You want to keep portraying Rittenhouse as a poor innocent kid targeted for carrying an AR. That’s not why he was chased. He was chased for having shot someone, then leaving the scene. That immediate perception directed certain responses, and
anyone who considered running after him could have reasonably thought that they were helping to detain a shooter. Rittenhouse is lucky that the folks he fired on won’t get much public sympathy due to their past record, but this could have been much worse, for anyone else inclined to act, or even random folks who might get hit by his gunfire.