Spending 30 years trying to keep that 300k pattern backfired, it seems. Too many statistical anomalies were created.Equality wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:28 pmConvert baptisms:
1990 – 330,877
2020 - 125,930
Church membership:
1990: 7,760,000
2020: 16,663,663
The LDS church claims "every member a missionary."
SAUCE
Ergo,
Converts per missionary 1990= 0.04
Converts per missionary 2020= 0.007
The member-missionary convert-baptism success rate was 5.7 times better in 1990 than 2020.
What can explain this? A decrease in the faith of the members? A field no longer white and ready to harvest? The world population has grown from 5.28 billion in 1990 to 7.753 billion in 2020, so the "field" of potential converts is much larger. One would expect that having twice as many member-missionaries and a pool of potential converts that is almost 50% larger would produce a much higher yield.
Maybe there weren't *really* 16,663,663 members in 2020?
Maybe there weren't *really* 330,887 converts in 1990?
Maybe the people who run this cult and lie about everything else also lie about their membership numbers.
Church membership numbers not good.
-
- God
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: Church membership numbers not good.
-
- God
- Posts: 5292
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Church membership numbers not good.
Again, what matters is the huge increase in numbers of members that do and/or will have access to temples. Earlier I mentioned that there is a winnowing occurring which will result in a change in actual numbers.Equality wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:28 pmConvert baptisms:
1990 – 330,877
2020 - 125,930
Church membership:
1990: 7,760,000
2020: 16,663,663
The LDS church claims "every member a missionary."
SAUCE
Ergo,
Converts per missionary 1990= 0.04
Converts per missionary 2020= 0.007
The member-missionary convert-baptism success rate was 5.7 times better in 1990 than 2020.
What can explain this? A decrease in the faith of the members? A field no longer white and ready to harvest? The world population has grown from 5.28 billion in 1990 to 7.753 billion in 2020, so the "field" of potential converts is much larger. One would expect that having twice as many member-missionaries and a pool of potential converts that is almost 50% larger would produce a much higher yield.
Maybe there weren't *really* 16,663,663 members in 2020?
Maybe there weren't *really* 330,887 converts in 1990?
Maybe the people who run this cult and lie about everything else also lie about their membership numbers.
I think we’re now seeing the “strait and narrow is the way and few there be that find it” kicking in to the overall scheme. It is people such as yourself that have an interest in ‘pure math’ and then see what you want to see. An incomplete picture.
Active and believing members of the church can see the ‘full’ picture of what is actually going on. The church is and will fulfill its destiny. Temples can’t be built fast enough.
But the church is giving it its best efforts.
Regards,
MG
-
- God
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: Church membership numbers not good.
How does announcing but not opening temples increase access, especially in areas that already have several under-used temples? But more specifically, how does this address Equality’s questions?MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:58 pmAgain, what matters is the huge increase in numbers of members that do and/or will have access to temples.Equality wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:28 pmConvert baptisms:
1990 – 330,877
2020 - 125,930
Church membership:
1990: 7,760,000
2020: 16,663,663
The LDS church claims "every member a missionary."
SAUCE
Ergo,
Converts per missionary 1990= 0.04
Converts per missionary 2020= 0.007
The member-missionary convert-baptism success rate was 5.7 times better in 1990 than 2020.
What can explain this? A decrease in the faith of the members? A field no longer white and ready to harvest? The world population has grown from 5.28 billion in 1990 to 7.753 billion in 2020, so the "field" of potential converts is much larger. One would expect that having twice as many member-missionaries and a pool of potential converts that is almost 50% larger would produce a much higher yield.
Maybe there weren't *really* 16,663,663 members in 2020?
Maybe there weren't *really* 330,887 converts in 1990?
Maybe the people who run this cult and lie about everything else also lie about their membership numbers.
So, is it “a huge increase,” or is it “a winnowing”?Earlier I mentioned that there is a winnowing occurring which will result in a change in actual numbers.
Having a testimony is fine, but this attempt to explain facts with inconsistent reasoning isn’t working.
-
- CTR B
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:04 pm
Re: Church membership numbers not good.
Real discussion of what? The inconsistent and impotent god you have concocted that fits what you have chosen to believe? There is no discussion, just you rearranging the size of the box you have shoved your god into in order to account for the blatant inconsistencies in your beliefs as they are pointed out to you. You may as well just respond with "its MAJIC!" - it would make way more sense than the ad-hoc, elohim-apologetics you engage in here to justify your need to believe in the myopic, fickle diety you have chosen to devote your life to.
To each his own but I have no idea who you are trying to convince other than yourself. Your need to blindly defend the One True real-estate development corp and its board of directors that you have "consecrated yourself, your time, talents, and everything with which the Lord has blessed you, or with which he may bless you (lol)" seems a bit desperate.
Last edited by Schreech on Wed Apr 06, 2022 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- malkie
- God
- Posts: 1660
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:41 pm
Re: Church membership numbers not good.
Even if you look at the ordained/set apart full-time missionaries, you see much the same pattern - as the number of missionaries increases, the number of converts per missionary falls. It's almost as if nothing really matters except for maintaining roughly the same number of converts/year, with some random variation included to make it look not faked.Equality wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:28 pmConvert baptisms:
1990 – 330,877
2020 - 125,930
Church membership:
1990: 7,760,000
2020: 16,663,663
The LDS church claims "every member a missionary."
SAUCE
Ergo,
Converts per missionary 1990= 0.04
Converts per missionary 2020= 0.007
The member-missionary convert-baptism success rate was 5.7 times better in 1990 than 2020.
What can explain this? A decrease in the faith of the members? A field no longer white and ready to harvest? The world population has grown from 5.28 billion in 1990 to 7.753 billion in 2020, so the "field" of potential converts is much larger. One would expect that having twice as many member-missionaries and a pool of potential converts that is almost 50% larger would produce a much higher yield.
Maybe there weren't *really* 16,663,663 members in 2020?
Maybe there weren't *really* 330,887 converts in 1990?
Maybe the people who run this cult and lie about everything else also lie about their membership numbers.

Numbers taken from http://www.fullerconsideration.com/membership.php
You can help Ukraine by talking for an hour a week!! PM me, or check www.enginprogram.org for details.
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
-
- God
- Posts: 5292
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Church membership numbers not good.
Good ol’ Schreech. Blast from the past. I have no idea where to go with this.Schreech wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 5:22 pmReal discussion of what? The inconsistent and impotent god you have concocted that fits what you have chosen to believe? There is no discussion, just you rearranging the size of the box you have shoved your god into in order to account for the blatant inconsistencies in your beliefs as they are pointed out to you. You may as well just respond with "its MAJIC!" - it would make way more sense than the ad-hoc, elohim-apologetics you engage in here to justify your need to believe in the myopic, fickle diety you have chosen to devote your life to.
To each his own but I have no idea who you are trying to convince other than yourself. Your need to blindly defend the One True real-estate development corp and its board of directors that you have "consecrated yourself, your time, talents, and everything with which the Lord has blessed you, or with which he may bless you (lol)" seems a bit desperate.
Regards,
MG
-
- God
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: Church membership numbers not good.
That’s a great website which I’ve looked at multiple times, but I didn’t remember those graphs! It’s a very clear visual, thanks for posting it.malkie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 6:30 pmEven if you look at the ordained/set apart full-time missionaries, you see much the same pattern - as the number of missionaries increases, the number of converts per missionary falls. It's almost as if nothing really matters except for maintaining roughly the same number of converts/year, with some random variation included to make it look not faked.Equality wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:28 pmConvert baptisms:
1990 – 330,877
2020 - 125,930
Church membership:
1990: 7,760,000
2020: 16,663,663
The LDS church claims "every member a missionary."
SAUCE
Ergo,
Converts per missionary 1990= 0.04
Converts per missionary 2020= 0.007
The member-missionary convert-baptism success rate was 5.7 times better in 1990 than 2020.
What can explain this? A decrease in the faith of the members? A field no longer white and ready to harvest? The world population has grown from 5.28 billion in 1990 to 7.753 billion in 2020, so the "field" of potential converts is much larger. One would expect that having twice as many member-missionaries and a pool of potential converts that is almost 50% larger would produce a much higher yield.
Maybe there weren't *really* 16,663,663 members in 2020?
Maybe there weren't *really* 330,887 converts in 1990?
Maybe the people who run this cult and lie about everything else also lie about their membership numbers.
Numbers taken from http://www.fullerconsideration.com/membership.php
- malkie
- God
- Posts: 1660
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:41 pm
Re: Church membership numbers not good.
Sorry for the confusion - I made the graphs using their data.Marcus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:19 amThat’s a great website which I’ve looked at multiple times, but I didn’t remember those graphs! It’s a very clear visual, thanks for posting it.malkie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 6:30 pm
Even if you look at the ordained/set apart full-time missionaries, you see much the same pattern - as the number of missionaries increases, the number of converts per missionary falls. It's almost as if nothing really matters except for maintaining roughly the same number of converts/year, with some random variation included to make it look not faked.
Numbers taken from http://www.fullerconsideration.com/membership.php
You can help Ukraine by talking for an hour a week!! PM me, or check www.enginprogram.org for details.
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
-
- God
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: Church membership numbers not good.

-
- God
- Posts: 2603
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:42 am
- Location: On the imaginary axis
Re: Church membership numbers not good.
My problem is a little deeper.Schreech wrote: ↑Wed Apr 06, 2022 5:22 pmTo each his own but I have no idea who you are trying to convince other than yourself. Your need to blindly defend the One True real-estate development corp and its board of directors that you have "consecrated yourself, your time, talents, and everything with which the Lord has blessed you, or with which he may bless you (lol)" seems a bit desperate.
I have no idea what coherent proposition MG is trying to convince himself of.
My current guess is that it doesn't go much beyond "Whatever those people say, they can't stop me being Mormon".
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.