85.2%

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
Gunnar
God
Posts: 3016
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:32 pm
Location: California

Re: 85.2%

Post by Gunnar »

Hound of Heaven wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:16 pm
Now that I've shared an article supporting my view that progressives are attempting to transform the Democrat party into a socialist one, you resort to extreme reactions and name-calling. An intelligent response could have highlighted the existence of various factions within the progressive movement, noting that the article I shared represents a more extreme viewpoint. However, you chose to align with the article's perspective instead. In other words, you believe the Democratic Party is no longer viable, that it has failed, and should be left behind. I find it quite amusing that you hold that view, considering you are the one who aligns with MAGA, not me! I suppose that aspect went beyond your forward-thinking progressive perspective.
Hound of Heaven, here is the complete final version of the 2024 Democrat Platform: Please read it!

I find the entire thing to be very well reasoned, practical and fair-minded, and it addresses very laudable goals that meet the legitimate needs and desires of most, if not all, ordinary Americans. If you find any points in it that are unreasonable or overly progressive and unfair to any factions in America, please point them out and argue your objections to them.

I see nothing radical or unfair in that platform that would justify the Ire of anybody, other than the most avaricious and selfish ultra-rich who seem never satisfied with what they have, no matter how wealthy and powerful they already are, and have nothing but disdain for their less fortunate, fellow Americans
No precept or claim is more suspect or more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.
User avatar
Hound of Heaven
Priest
Posts: 304
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm

Re: 85.2%

Post by Hound of Heaven »

huckelberry wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 11:47 pm
Hound of Heaven wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 3:47 pm
[q
What are the culturally unique needs of white individuals that are being ignored?



Wrogressive views as adversaries.

In my opinion, along with many other Democrats, the progressive movement appears to be attempting to impose socialism on America, and I will not permit that to occur. Disagreeing with progressive socialism does not equate to being a MAGA supporter.

https://diem25.org/progressives-must-fa ... rats-loss/
This article provides a clear explanation of how progressives perceive the broader Democratic Party. I encourage you to review it, as it outlines the extent of the progressives' disdain for the remainder of the party and details their efforts to shift the rest of the party towards socialism. This article clearly articulates how many moderate democrats, like myself, perceive the far-left progressives attempting to dominate the party. If I have misunderstood this article, I would appreciate an explanation of how I am misinterpreting the progressive values presented within it.


It is important to note that the article presents the perspective that liberalism has not succeeded. As someone with liberal views, what should my perspective be on that? Later in the article, the progressive perspective suggests that liberalism is an outdated ideology that fails to provide anything of significance and should be discarded.
Hound, I am puzzled by your presenting this article. It complains that the Democratic party is not doing what you fear it is doing. You should not be surprised by the existence of such anti liberal voices. They have long been around. I remember reading such in the late 60s. Such views were not new then. I do not have a beginning date but I feel the article is the same old song and dance being sung by those elements for the past hundred years.

I suppose there is some reason some folks feel white men are being disregarded by Democratic party. I am not entirely sure why. There appears to be quite a few white males in the party.
Politics often lacks fairness, and in many instances, your identity is shaped more by your opponent's portrayal than by your true self. That being noted, progressive perspectives like the idea that everyone except white individuals are victims of colonialism, the inclusion of transwomen in female sports teams, the 1619 Project, DEI initiatives, and various other concepts, enabled Trump to characterize the entire Democratic Party as a group of progressives who despise America. The combination of that and an open border enabled Trump and the Republicans to take control of the 2024 election.

In the coming years, history will regard former democrat Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter as a pivotal moment in American politics for this century. Do you recall the stick figure meme that Elon posted on Twitter which illustrated stick figures along an ideological spectrum? One of the stick figures was labeled Me, indicating Elon. The "me" stick figure appears to be stationary, while the ground around him shifts. The stick figure that begins in 2008 on the left side of the center line ultimately shifts to a right-leaning conservative position by 2021. Upon closer examination of the meme, it becomes clear that Elon is expressing that he has remained constant, while the environment surrounding him has shifted. He attributes the shifting ground around him to the influence of woke progressives. Following the meme's posting, Elon tweeted, I strongly supported Obama for president, but today's Democratic Party has been hijacked by extremists. A few days later, he posted another tweet stating, "the far left hates everyone, themselves included." The meme and those two tweets sent the far left into a complete frenzy, leading them to become utterly unhinged as they realized that Elon buying Twitter signaled the end of traditional media as we have known it throughout our lives.

Having experienced a overwhelming loss in the election, we are now faced with several options. We have the option to shift further to the radical left and fully embrace woke culture, or we can gravitate towards the center to attract more moderate Democrats in the upcoming election, as well as some Republicans who might be open to crossing party lines to support Democrats. Which option do you believe will result in a greater number of votes for the Democrats?

At any moment when Elon began to consider leaving the party, there ought to have been a queue of notable Democrats at his door, inquiring about his feelings toward the party and making efforts to persuade him to remain, so he could assist in addressing the issues he perceived as problematic. However, that did not occur because once Elon began to challenge the party and its shift towards the far left, he was labeled a nazi, a racist, a fascist, and subjected to every other derogatory term the far left employs to tarnish someone's reputation when they have the audacity to question progressivism.

In deed, I hold the progressives responsible for driving significant figures away from our party and into the embrace of Donald Trump. The progressive movement undeniably employs aggressive tactics to coerce individuals into embracing their far-left agenda. The article I provided illustrates how progressives are unwilling to collaborate with anyone, including their fellow Democrats, to advance their agenda. I share Elon’s perspective that the progressive movement can, in a way, compel individuals to harbor self-hatred. It’s crucial for the progressives on the board to grasp this point. As someone who identifies as a center-left democrat, or what I refer to as a JFK democrat, I was mindful while writing my thoughts of how the progressives on the board might attempt to frame my perspective. It seems that individuals like Molok often resort to name-calling and labeling others as racist, fascist, or bigoted when faced with opinions that diverge from their progressive ideology. In the moment, that might be cathartic but ultimately that attitude pushes people away, personally and politically.

To conclude this post, here’s my final thought. In recent years, we have seen the departure of several notable Democrats who have now become leading conservative influencers. Even Tim Pool, who somewhat identifies as an independent-leaning Democrat, is so fed up with the far left that he voted for Trump. Following the election, other Democrats like Steven A. Smith, Charlamagne tha God, Bill Maher, and several other influencers are beginning to express sentiments that suggest they may consider leaving the party and possibly aligning with MAGA. The Republicans have established a network of influencers that the Democrats struggle to match. Each day, the conservative influencers who currently dominate independent media will continue to remind their audience that the strategy of far-left progressives is to compel individuals to accept their woke ideology, that it's the only way forward. It is irrelevant whether the claims are accurate, as progressives often react defensively, labeling critics as racist or bigoted when negative discussions arise about their agenda. This response can create an impression that they feel compelled to coerce acceptance of their far-left views through guilt. Progressivism survives only when it has control of people who influence the masses. It's not a winning strategy. No one likes a bully.
User avatar
Molok
CTR A
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:51 pm

Re: 85.2%

Post by Molok »

Ok, so more incoherent rambling about how progressives are evil, and no specifics to demonstrate how the progressive movement has been anything other than ignored by the Democrat party. I call troll. In retrospect, as soon as Ceeboo agreed with him I should have seen that. My bad.
User avatar
ceeboo
God
Posts: 1741
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:22 pm

Re: 85.2%

Post by ceeboo »

Molok wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2024 3:25 pm
Ok, so more incoherent rambling about how progressives are evil, and no specifics to demonstrate how the progressive movement has been anything other than ignored by the Democrat party. I call troll. In retrospect, as soon as Ceeboo agreed with him I should have seen that. My bad.
Hey Molok - Since you injected my name in your response to HOH, I thought I would make a suggestion to you. The HOH post that you responded to is littered with wisdom, value, and accuracy. While I am fairly sure that you will refuse to consider such things, your refusal doesn't remove said wisdom, value, and accuracy.
User avatar
Hound of Heaven
Priest
Posts: 304
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm

Re: 85.2%

Post by Hound of Heaven »

Molok wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2024 3:25 pm
Ok, so more incoherent rambling about how progressives are evil, and no specifics to demonstrate how the progressive movement has been anything other than ignored by the Democrat party. I call troll. In retrospect, as soon as Ceeboo agreed with him I should have seen that. My bad.
I'm not sure if "troll" is included in the titles you've provided me, but I'll add it regardless, thanks. I never referred to progressives as evil; that seems to be your interpretation of my words, perhaps influenced by your own feelings, though I can't say for certain.

Molok, let's shift our focus from the minor disagreement between us that perhaps only a handful of people are aware of, and instead consider a much larger and more intriguing development involving Lindy Li, a Democratic fundraiser who has successfully raised millions for Kamala in this election. She believes that the Democratic Party is experiencing a complete breakdown and feels frustrated that the party continues to permit progressives to demonize those who have the bravery to voice the necessary changes for the party to begin winning elections once more. She expressed that we cannot continue to cater to the fringe of the party to the detriment of the American people, and I concur with her perspective.

Please consider examining the treatment she is receiving from the fringe left progressives within the party. Progressives are attempting to demonize her for voicing her opinions and proposing sensible measures that could aid the party in achieving victory in 2028. Similar to Tulsi, Lindy is probably going to leave the party and align with the Republicans. The more the progressives insult her and treat her poorly, the sooner she'll depart and become a conservative fundraiser, determined to challenge the Democrats in 2028. The departure of individuals like Lindy Li from the party is due to the progressives, not moderates such as myself.

What will it take for progressives to understand that they have backed themselves into a corner, and that no wants to engage with them any longer? Could it be Lindy Li leaving the party? What if Steven A. Smith accompanies her, or perhaps Charlemagne? How many influencers or democrat fundraisers must depart from the party before progressives recognize the necessity of uniting with the broader party, along with some conservatives and independents, to secure electoral victories?

The situation with Lindy Li and the minor disagreement between us are essentially the same. One individual expresses a viewpoint that diverges from the progressive narrative, leading to an onslaught of attacks from progressives who seek to vilify and label this person as a bigot, racist, or similar. In the last 15 years, progressives have embraced a confrontational approach, targeting anyone who disagrees with them. This election, that strategy of attacking everyone who holds a different view ultimately led to the Democratic Party's defeat. A bully is universally disliked.
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 8268
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: 85.2%

Post by canpakes »

Hound of Heaven wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:44 pm
Elon Musk …
Elon Musk always straddled the political fence but took a strong lean rightward due to COVID restrictions and tax/regulation issues surrounding Tesla. His ‘anti-woke’ stand is a direct response to and rejection of his own son’s gender transition. I don’t know that pro-business tax exemptions and rejection of family over transgender issues are angles that the Democratic Party should necessarily adopt, but I’ll not draw conclusions until you expand on that.

Hound of Heaven wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:44 pm
Tim Pool, …
Folks sometimes want to lump Tim into the ‘ex liberal’ pool (ha) because he jumped into celebritydom from doing some Occupy Wall Street reporting, but he comes from a more libertarian history. He has stated that he “never aligned” with the Occupy movement (5:20 in the video link below from 6 years ago) and is pro-life with regard to abortion (later in the same video). Tim was recently criticized for broadcasting paid propaganda from Russian sources (second link). I’m not sure that liberals ‘lost’ Tim as I’m not sure that he was ever well-aligned with liberals or Democrats (beyond his occasional past support for some of Sanders’ ideas), or that liberals should start pushing paid Russian propaganda, but I’ll not draw conclusions until you expand on that.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V1rCjUGlOD4

https://www.wired.com/story/influencers ... da-videos/

Hound of Heaven wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:44 pm
The Republicans have established a network of influencers that the Democrats struggle to match. Each day, the conservative influencers who currently dominate independent media …

Progressivism survives only when it has control of people who influence the masses. It's not a winning strategy.
This is contradictory. Which is it? You state that the same thing is an insurmountable advantage for Republicans but that the same type of media influence is bad for Progressives. Expand on that.

Hound of Heaven wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:44 pm
No one likes a bully.
Sure they do. We have a hundred examples from history to choose from, and the country just ‘elected’ the two largest bullies within our borders. Well, one of them was elected, anyway, with the other just being foisted upon us because the elected guy likes his money.

Anyhow, I look forward to your examination of the Democratic Party’s toxic platform elements, and to your suggestions about how the Democratic Party should pander to white males. I mean, the latter could be a winning strategy, given the size of that demographic, but I’m curious as to how you believe that fits into liberal ideology, and what actions you believe it entails that can meet the goal while skirting socialism.

Anytime you’re ready. ; )
Dr Exiled
God
Posts: 2046
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm

Re: 85.2%

Post by Dr Exiled »

I believe what we are seeing is a classic example of "othering."

https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-othering-5084425

Politics is ripe for it and people feel power in pointing the finger at the "others." We've seen it for years with Rush Limbaugh and still see it where a policy proposal that looks to involve government in the slightest way somehow is immediately labeled as socialist or communist. On the other side, we saw Trump labeled as a Nazi over and over again and Maga being labeled as racist, even some proposing that all whites were somehow racist.

It's meant to divide and separate when we really need to come together and push for policies, reforms and laws that benefit all instead of the few that run things currently. Both parties are dominated by the donor class that ain't you and me and we should always remember that. Trump has catered a bunch of billionaires that don't have our interests in line and will fight any proposals that will make them sacrifice. However, the democrats have done the same thing and I believe all this push for wokeness and racism, etc. is merely a way to get us to fight amongst ourselves while the donor class continues to promote their interests at the expense of ours. Divide and rule.

It's a big club and you ain't in it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nyvxt1svxso
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 8268
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: 85.2%

Post by canpakes »

ceeboo wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2024 3:56 pm
The HOH post that you responded to is littered with wisdom, value, and accuracy.
Perhaps HOH can help you to find your voice on whether or not you believe that the citizen children of illegal immigrants should be deported.
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 5331
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: 85.2%

Post by Gadianton »

Perhaps HOH can help you to find your voice on whether or not you believe that the citizen children of illegal immigrants should be deported.
Would be good to know since it could mean my right-wing friend and his wife, and potentially his children and grandchildren may all be subject to deportation. What about if one parent only is illegal? He himself could be safe in that case.

(who is HOH?)
Social distancing has likely already begun to flatten the curve...Continue to research good antivirals and vaccine candidates. Make everyone wear masks. -- J.D. Vance
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 8268
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: 85.2%

Post by canpakes »

Gadianton wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:21 pm
(who is HOH?)
I abbreviated Hound Of Heaven’s name.

Who is none of these people, below -

Image
Post Reply