Formal Mormon Theology

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 2006
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by I Have Questions »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:25 pm
God cannot create sentient and independent beings who are all 'naturally' good.
If your God cannot do that then he isn’t a God. Your God supposedly created Jesus Christ, are you saying your Lord and Saviour wasn’t all “naturally” good?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Mag’ladroth
Nursery
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2025 2:21 am

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by Mag’ladroth »

I Have Questions wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:41 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:25 pm
God cannot create sentient and independent beings who are all 'naturally' good.
If your God cannot do that then he isn’t a God. Your God supposedly created Jesus Christ, are you saying your Lord and Saviour wasn’t all “naturally” good?
MG’s responses are why I say LDS theology is entirely unsystematic.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5575
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by MG 2.0 »

I Have Questions wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:41 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:25 pm
God cannot create sentient and independent beings who are all 'naturally' good.
If your God cannot do that then he isn’t a God. Your God supposedly created Jesus Christ, are you saying your Lord and Saviour wasn’t all “naturally” good?
No. Sometimes you amaze/disappoint me, IHQ.

I gave you more credit than what might be due.

I'm not meaning to be rude as much as just plain disheartened.

Regards
MG
Marcus
God
Posts: 6705
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by Marcus »

Mag’ladroth wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:14 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:41 pm
If your God cannot do that then he isn’t a God. Your God supposedly created Jesus Christ, are you saying your Lord and Saviour wasn’t all “naturally” good?
MG’s responses are why I say LDS theology is entirely unsystematic.
No argument there.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5575
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by MG 2.0 »

Marcus wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:46 pm
Mag’ladroth wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:14 pm
MG’s responses are why I say LDS theology is entirely unsystematic.
No argument there.
I wouldn't say entirely. Would you like to propose and lay out why you believe LDS theology is entirely unsystematic since you're agreeing to support this claim?

Regards,
MG
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 2006
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by I Have Questions »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:29 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:41 pm
If your God cannot do that then he isn’t a God. Your God supposedly created Jesus Christ, are you saying your Lord and Saviour wasn’t all “naturally” good?
No. Sometimes you amaze/disappoint me, IHQ.

I gave you more credit than what might be due.

I'm not meaning to be rude as much as just plain disheartened.

Regards
MG
Okay, so explain how I’ve misunderstood your assertion that Mormon “God cannot create sentient and independent beings who are all 'naturally' good.”
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5575
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by MG 2.0 »

I Have Questions wrote:
Sat Jun 21, 2025 8:46 am
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:29 pm
No. Sometimes you amaze/disappoint me, IHQ.

I gave you more credit than what might be due.

I'm not meaning to be rude as much as just plain disheartened.

Regards
MG
Okay, so explain how I’ve misunderstood your assertion that Mormon “God cannot create sentient and independent beings who are all 'naturally' good.”
Are you "naturally good"? Naturally bad? Somewhere in between?

Can you picture yourself being any other way than what you are? Created differently? Would you want that?

You are who you are with all your faults and strengths.

You're not alone. What and who we are is out of God's control EXCEPT for the fact that He has given commandments and laws that CAN help us to change our natures to become more like he is.

He cannot create us in perfected form. We are a product of biology and what we came with...and then we interact with our environment. Lots of moving parts. In a world of chaotic interactions. God cannot control everything that happens.

But He can allow for what happens and correct for it.

Atonement of Jesus Christ.

Regards,
MG
huckelberry
God
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by huckelberry »

I Have Questions wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:41 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:25 pm
God cannot create sentient and independent beings who are all 'naturally' good.
If your God cannot do that then he isn’t a God. Your God supposedly created Jesus Christ, are you saying your Lord and Saviour wasn’t all “naturally” good?
This particular tangle is part of the reason traditional Christianity came to think Jesus or the divine in him is not a created being. It might be a bit unclear just how LDS thought works on the question. Perhaps for LDS the divine is eternal and incarnate in human for both father and son.
huckelberry
God
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by huckelberry »

huckelberry wrote:
Sat Jun 21, 2025 4:44 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:41 pm
If your God cannot do that then he isn’t a God. Your God supposedly created Jesus Christ, are you saying your Lord and Saviour wasn’t all “naturally” good?
This particular tangle is part of the reason traditional Christianity came to think Jesus or the divine in him is not a created being. It might be a bit unclear just how LDS thought works on the question. Perhaps for LDS the divine is eternal and incarnate in human for both father and son.
I think Ego is inclined to thinking of the eternal dimension of divine as being beyond personal but being laws like the laws of physics. The personal aspect being entirely in the human personages in which it is incarnate. I do not see how volition and power fit together here. Volition from the human but divine power seems a puzzle.

Well there is the more traditional view that the fundamental power, God, is volitional and eternal not derived from a source.
Last edited by huckelberry on Sat Jun 21, 2025 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 2006
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by I Have Questions »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Sat Jun 21, 2025 3:29 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Sat Jun 21, 2025 8:46 am
Okay, so explain how I’ve misunderstood your assertion that Mormon “God cannot create sentient and independent beings who are all 'naturally' good.”
Are you "naturally good"? Naturally bad? Somewhere in between?

Can you picture yourself being any other way than what you are? Created differently? Would you want that?

You are who you are with all your faults and strengths.

You're not alone. What and who we are is out of God's control EXCEPT for the fact that He has given commandments and laws that CAN help us to change our natures to become more like he is.

He cannot create us in perfected form. We are a product of biology and what we came with...and then we interact with our environment. Lots of moving parts. In a world of chaotic interactions. God cannot control everything that happens.

But He can allow for what happens and correct for it.

Atonement of Jesus Christ.

Regards,
MG
You seem to be conflating “can’t” with “won’t” and in doing so you render your God as something other than an actual God.

So was your Lord and Saviour not naturally all good when he was on the earth? A simple yes or no is all that’s required.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Post Reply